Literature DB >> 23263779

Effect of nodal metastases on cancer-specific mortality after cytoreductive nephrectomy.

Quoc-Dien Trinh1, Shyam Sukumar, Jan Schmitges, Marco Bianchi, Maxine Sun, Shahrokh F Shariat, Jesse D Sammon, Claudio Jeldres, Kevin C Zorn, Paul Perrotte, Markus Graefen, Craig G Rogers, James O Peabody, Mani Menon, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relatively few reports have described the outcomes of patients with node-positive renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the presence of distant metastases. We examined the outcomes of these patients in a large population-based cohort and examined the ability of standard risk factors to predict cancer-specific mortality (CSM).
METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 1415 RCC patients with distant metastases undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CNT) were identified. Univariable and multivariable analyses addressed CSM to identify independent predictors of CSM. First, the effect of nodal disease on CSM and overall mortality (OM) was estimated in patients with metastatic disease (N0M1 vs. N1M1). Then, we examined the effect of the number of removed nodes and the number of positive nodes on CSM to quantify the effect on mortality, if any, of the increasing burden of nodal disease.
RESULTS: Actuarial survival estimates demonstrated that for patients with nodal disease 40.2, 23.5 and 11.5 % of patients survived at 12, 24 and 60 months after nephrectomy. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients with N1M1 disease had a significantly worse CSM when compared to patients with N0M1 disease (log rank p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, N1M1 had a 68 and 69 % increase in CSM and OM (vs. N0M1 disease) while, for every additional positive node, CSM and OM increased by 5.1 and 5.6 %.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CNT, the burden of nodal disease is an independent predictor of CSM, with an incremental effect of every additional positive node.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23263779     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2806-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  Rethinking lymph node metastasis and cytoreductive nephrectomy.

Authors:  Michael Leveridge
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy: a bibliographic review.

Authors:  Oscar Rodriguez Faba; Sabine D Brookman-May; Estefania Linares; Alberto Breda; Francesca Pisano; José Daniel Subiela; Francesco Sanguedolce; Maurizio Brausi; Joan Palou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Pathologic Predictors of Survival During Lymph Node Dissection for Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Multicenter Collaboration.

Authors:  Juan Chipollini; E Jason Abel; Charles C Peyton; David C Boulware; Jose A Karam; Vitaly Margulis; Viraj A Master; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Surena F Matin; Wade J Sexton; Jay D Raman; Christopher G Wood; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 4.  The contemporary role of lymph node dissection in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Jehonathan H Pinthus; Paul Russo
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-08-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.