Literature DB >> 2326150

Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.

J A Stillman1, R J Irwin.   

Abstract

The application of the power-spectrum model of masking to the detectability of a signal masked by dichotic noise was investigated in three experiments. In each experiment, the signal was a 2-kHz sinusoid of 400-msec duration, masked by either one or two 800-Hz wide bands of noise presented singly or in pairs. In Experiment 1, we compared the detectability of a diotic signal masked by dichotic noise with the detectability of a monaural signal masked by each of the noises separately. The spectrum level of the noise was 35 dB SPL. For dichotic presentations, the signal was sent to both ears while pairs of noise bands, one below and one above the signal frequency, were presented together, one band to each ear. Threshold levels with the dichotic stimuli were lower than or equal to the thresholds with either ear's stimulus on its own. Similar dichotic stimuli were used in Experiment 2, except that the signal frequency was nearer to one or the other of the bands of masking noise, and the noise had a spectrum level of 50 dB SPL. In Experiment 3, thresholds were obtained with two sets of symmetrically and asymmetrically placed notched-noise maskers. For one of these sets, the spectrum level of both noise bands was 35 dB SPL; for the other set, interaural intensity differences were introduced in the form of an inequality in the levels of the noise bands on either side of the signal. In one ear, the spectrum level of the lower frequency noise band was 35 dB SPL and the spectrum level of the higher frequency noise band was 25 dB SPL, whereas in the other ear, the allocation of noise level to noise band was reversed. The dichotic thresholds obtained with the unequal noise maskers could be predicted from the shapes of the auditory filters derived with equal noise maskers. The data from all three experiments suggest that threshold signal levels in the presence of interaural differences in masker intensity depend principally on the ear with the higher signal-to-masker ratio at the output of its auditory filter, a finding consistent with the power-spectrum model of masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2326150     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  21 in total

1.  USE OF NOISE TO ELIMINATE ONE EAR FROM MASKING EXPERIMENTS.

Authors:  P B WESTON; J D MILLER
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Stimulus variability and auditory filter shape.

Authors:  R D Patterson; G B Henning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On the growth of masking asymmetry with stimulus intensity.

Authors:  R A Lutfi; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory filter shapes in forward masking as a function of level.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry.

Authors:  R D Patterson; I Nimmo-Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired.

Authors:  R S Tyler; J W Hall; B R Glasberg; B C Moore; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.