BACKGROUND: Patients and athletes with diminished gluteal muscle activation are thought to have 'gluteal inhibition'. This may be a component of arthrogenic neuromuscular inhibition, which has been well documented in the knee and generalized to all joints. While clinical evidence surrounding gluteal inhibition increases, supportive research is non-existent. This study investigated whether arthrogenic neuromuscular inhibition occurred about the hip following instillation of intra-articular fluid during functional hip extension tasks. METHODS: Data was collected in a biomechanics laboratory (control) and hospital setting (intervention). Nine healthy individuals (4M/5F) comprised the control group. The intervention group contained twelve patients (4M/8F) with hip pathology requiring a magnetic resonance arthrogram (capsular distension via intra-articular fluid injection) procedure. The participants performed a pelvic bridge (PB) and active hip extension (EXT) before and after the control time or injection. Peak EMG from the gluteus maximus (GM) was collected bilaterally. FINDINGS: The findings of this study provide substantial support for arthrogenic inhibition following hip intra-articular fluid instillation during functional tasks. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant group by session interaction effect (PB,EXT: affected/unaffected=0.0192/0.9654 P=0.05, <0.0001/0.0826 P=0.05). Tukey post hoc revealed decreases in ipsilateral peak GM EMG following intervention were significant (0.0238/<0.0001 P=0.025). No changes were observed in the control group. INTERPRETATION: These concepts are of clinical importance to both patient and athletic populations. Understanding the role of gluteal inhibition in the injury process is essential to the development of rehabilitation and prevention protocols. Restoration and promotion of optimal recruitment patterns are crucial to enhancing athletic performance.
BACKGROUND:Patients and athletes with diminished gluteal muscle activation are thought to have 'gluteal inhibition'. This may be a component of arthrogenic neuromuscular inhibition, which has been well documented in the knee and generalized to all joints. While clinical evidence surrounding gluteal inhibition increases, supportive research is non-existent. This study investigated whether arthrogenic neuromuscular inhibition occurred about the hip following instillation of intra-articular fluid during functional hip extension tasks. METHODS: Data was collected in a biomechanics laboratory (control) and hospital setting (intervention). Nine healthy individuals (4M/5F) comprised the control group. The intervention group contained twelve patients (4M/8F) with hip pathology requiring a magnetic resonance arthrogram (capsular distension via intra-articular fluid injection) procedure. The participants performed a pelvic bridge (PB) and active hip extension (EXT) before and after the control time or injection. Peak EMG from the gluteus maximus (GM) was collected bilaterally. FINDINGS: The findings of this study provide substantial support for arthrogenic inhibition following hip intra-articular fluid instillation during functional tasks. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant group by session interaction effect (PB,EXT: affected/unaffected=0.0192/0.9654 P=0.05, <0.0001/0.0826 P=0.05). Tukey post hoc revealed decreases in ipsilateral peak GM EMG following intervention were significant (0.0238/<0.0001 P=0.025). No changes were observed in the control group. INTERPRETATION: These concepts are of clinical importance to both patient and athletic populations. Understanding the role of gluteal inhibition in the injury process is essential to the development of rehabilitation and prevention protocols. Restoration and promotion of optimal recruitment patterns are crucial to enhancing athletic performance.
Authors: Viviane Bortoluzzi Frasson; Marco Aurélio Vaz; Anete Beling Morales; Anna Torresan; Marco Aurélio Telöken; Paulo David Fortis Gusmão; Marcus Vinicius Crestani; Bruno Manfredini Baroni Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Joanne L Kemp; Michael Makdissi; Anthony G Schache; Caroline F Finch; Michael G Pritchard; Kay M Crossley Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Matthew J Mastenbrook; Paul K Commean; Travis J Hillen; Gretchen B Salsich; Gretchen A Meyer; Michael J Mueller; John C Clohisy; Marcie Harris-Hayes Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Marcie Harris-Hayes; Sylvia Czuppon; Linda R Van Dillen; Karen Steger-May; Shirley Sahrmann; Mario Schootman; Gretchen B Salsich; John C Clohisy; Michael J Mueller Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 4.751