Literature DB >> 28992772

Hip Abductor Muscle Volume and Strength Differences Between Women With Chronic Hip Joint Pain and Asymptomatic Controls.

Matthew J Mastenbrook, Paul K Commean, Travis J Hillen, Gretchen B Salsich, Gretchen A Meyer, Michael J Mueller, John C Clohisy, Marcie Harris-Hayes.   

Abstract

Study Design Secondary analysis, cross-sectional study. Background Chronic hip joint pain (CHJP) can lead to limitations in activity participation, but the musculoskeletal factors associated with the condition are relatively unknown. Understanding the factors associated with CHJP may help develop rehabilitation strategies to improve quality of life of individuals with long-term hip pain. Objectives To compare measures of hip abductor muscle volume and hip abductor muscle strength between women with CHJP and asymptomatic controls. Methods Thirty women, 15 with CHJP and 15 matched asymptomatic controls (age range, 18-40 years), participated in this study. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine the volume of the primary hip abductor muscles, consisting of the gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, a small portion of the gluteus maximus, and the tensor fascia latae, within a defined region of interest. Break tests were performed using a handheld dynamometer to assess hip abductor strength. During the strength test, the participant was positioned in sidelying with the involved hip in 15° of abduction. Independent-samples t tests were used to compare muscle volume and strength values between those with CHJP and asymptomatic controls. Results Compared to asymptomatic controls, women with CHJP demonstrated significantly increased gluteal muscle volume (228 ± 40 cm3 versus 199 ± 29 cm3, P = .032), but decreased hip abductor strength (74.6 ± 16.8 Nm versus 93.6 ± 20.2 Nm, P = .009). There were no significant differences in tensor fascia lata muscle volume between the 2 groups (P = .640). Conclusion Women with CHJP appear to have larger gluteal muscle volume, but decreased hip abductor strength, compared to asymptomatic controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(12):923-930. Epub 9 Oct 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7380.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamometry; femoroacetabular impingement; gluteals; magnetic resonance imaging; movement system

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28992772      PMCID: PMC5991486          DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  38 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  The diagnostic validity of hip provocation maneuvers to detect intra-articular hip pathology.

Authors:  Erin Maslowski; William Sullivan; Jeri Forster Harwood; Peter Gonzalez; Marla Kaufman; Armando Vidal; Venu Akuthota
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study.

Authors:  Marita Cross; Emma Smith; Damian Hoy; Sandra Nolte; Ilana Ackerman; Marlene Fransen; Lisa Bridgett; Sean Williams; Francis Guillemin; Catherine L Hill; Laura L Laslett; Graeme Jones; Flavia Cicuttini; Richard Osborne; Theo Vos; Rachelle Buchbinder; Anthony Woolf; Lyn March
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging.

Authors:  Douglas N Mintz; Timothy Hooper; David Connell; Robert Buly; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The reliability and validity of handheld dynamometry for the measurement of lower-extremity muscle strength in older adults.

Authors:  Cathy M Arnold; Kathryn D Warkentin; Philip D Chilibeck; Charlene R A Magnus
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Persons with chronic hip joint pain exhibit reduced hip muscle strength.

Authors:  Marcie Harris-Hayes; Michael J Mueller; Shirley A Sahrmann; Nancy J Bloom; Karen Steger-May; John C Clohisy; Gretchen B Salsich
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Femoroacetabular impingement and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Charlie Zhang; Linda Li; Bruce B Forster; Jacek A Kopec; Charles Ratzlaff; Lalji Halai; Jolanda Cibere; John M Esdaile
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Hip pain in young adults.

Authors:  Miguel Fernandez; Peter Wall; John O'Donnell; Damian Griffin
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2014-04

9.  Changes of gluteus medius muscle in the adult patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  RuiYu Liu; XiaoDong Wen; ZhiQin Tong; KunZheng Wang; ChunSheng Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  7 in total

1.  Appropriate sites for the measurement of the cross-sectional area of the gluteus maximus and the gluteus medius muscles in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Daisuke Homma; Izumi Minato; Norio Imai; Dai Miyasaka; Yoshinori Sakai; Yoji Horigome; Hayato Suzuki; Hayato Shimada; Yoichiro Dohmae; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  The biomechanical disadvantage of dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Molly C Shepherd; Ke Song; Brecca M M Gaffney; Travis J Hillen; Marcie Harris-Hayes; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 3.  Towards defining muscular regions of interest from axial magnetic resonance imaging with anatomical cross-reference: a scoping review of lateral hip musculature.

Authors:  Zuzana Perraton; Peter Lawrenson; Andrea B Mosler; James M Elliott; Kenneth A Weber; Natasha Ams Flack; Jon Cornwall; Rebecca J Crawford; Christopher Stewart; Adam I Semciw
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  HIP MUSCLE INHIBITION AFTER HIP ARTHROSCOPY: A ROLE FOR NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION.

Authors:  Allison M Mumbleau; Nathan D Schilaty; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

5.  No Difference in Hip Muscle Volumes and Fatty Infiltration in Those With Hip-Related Pain Compared to Controls.

Authors:  Timothy H Retchford; Kylie J Tucker; Harvi F Hart; Adam I Semciw; Patrick Weinrauch; Alison Grimaldi; Sallie M Cowan; Kay M Crossley; Joanne L Kemp
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  Tensor Fascia Latae Muscle Structure and Activation in Individuals With Lower Limb Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Manuela Besomi; Liam Maclachlan; Rebecca Mellor; Bill Vicenzino; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Comparison between movement pattern training and strengthening on muscle volume, muscle fat, and strength in patients with hip-related groin pain: An exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Kristen Koch; Adam I Semciw; Paul K Commean; Travis J Hillen; G Kelley Fitzgerald; John C Clohisy; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.