Literature DB >> 23260709

Utility of C4d immunostaining in the first year after pediatric and young adult heart transplantation.

Ying Xu1, Csaba Galambos, Miguel Reyes-Múgica, Susan A Miller, Adriana Zeevi, Steven A Webber, Brian Feingold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: C4d assessment of endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) after heart transplantation (HTx) has been widely adopted to aid in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), yet it remains unclear whether or not to assess all patients routinely and with what frequency/duration. In this study we sought to evaluate the utility of routine C4d immunostaining in the first year after pediatric and young adult HTx.
METHODS: We reviewed pre-transplant alloantibody and clinical data, including serial EMB reports, on all 51 patients who received HTx at our center since we instituted routine C4d staining of all first-year EMBs. C4d was considered positive if diffuse capillary staining (≥ 2(+)) was present. Rare/focal capillary staining or absence of staining was considered negative.
RESULTS: Twenty-six of 406 first-year EMBs (6%) were C4d(+) in 6 (12%) patients. Sixty-five percent of all C4d(+) EMBs occurred by 30 days post-transplant. Five of 6 patients had pre-transplant donor-specific antibody (DSA) ≥ 4,000 MFI. The sixth patient had neither pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies nor a positive donor-specific cytotoxicity crossmatch (DSXM), but there was clinical concern for AMR. Among the entire cohort, 5 of 10 patients with pre-transplant DSA ≥ 4,000 MFI and/or a positive DSXM were C4d(+) compared with only 1 of 41 without (50% vs 2%; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the first year after HTx, C4d(+) occurred early and only in children and young adults with pre-transplant DSA or with clinical suspicion of AMR. Although our data suggest that assessment limited to the first 90 days post-transplant in patients with pre-transplant DSA ≥ 4,000 MFI may be appropriate in the absence of clinical concern for AMR, further research is needed to determine the optimum strategy for post-transplant surveillance.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23260709      PMCID: PMC3530146          DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  18 in total

1.  Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.

Authors:  Susan Stewart; Gayle L Winters; Michael C Fishbein; Henry D Tazelaar; Jon Kobashigawa; Jacki Abrams; Claus B Andersen; Annalisa Angelini; Gerald J Berry; Margaret M Burke; Anthony J Demetris; Elizabeth Hammond; Silviu Itescu; Charles C Marboe; Bruce McManus; Elaine F Reed; Nancy L Reinsmoen; E Rene Rodriguez; Alan G Rose; Marlene Rose; Nicole Suciu-Focia; Adriana Zeevi; Margaret E Billingham
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Early screening for antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Abdallah G Kfoury; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Gregory L Snow; Josef Stehlik; Bruce B Reid; James W Long; Edward M Gilbert; Feras M Bader; David A Bull; Dale G Renlund
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Controversies in defining cardiac antibody-mediated rejection: need for updated criteria.

Authors:  Abdallah G Kfoury; M Elizabeth H Hammond
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Accumulation of hyaluronan (hyaluronic acid) in myocardial interstitial tissue parallels development of transplantation edema in heart allografts in rats.

Authors:  R Hällgren; B Gerdin; A Tengblad; G Tufveson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Antibody-mediated rejection in human cardiac allografts: evaluation of immunoglobulins and complement activation products C4d and C3d as markers.

Authors:  E R Rodriguez; Diane V Skojec; Carmela D Tan; Andrea A Zachary; Edward K Kasper; John V Conte; William M Baldwin
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 6.  Pros and cons for C4d as a biomarker.

Authors:  Danielle Cohen; Robert B Colvin; Mohamed R Daha; Cinthia B Drachenberg; Mark Haas; Volker Nickeleit; Jane E Salmon; Banu Sis; Ming-Hui Zhao; Jan A Bruijn; Ingeborg M Bajema
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Characterization of c4d immunostaining utilizing paraffin-embedded tissue of nonpresensitized pediatric heart transplant patients.

Authors:  Csaba Galambos; Brian Feingold; Steven A Webber
Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol       Date:  2007-08-06

8.  Cardiovascular mortality among heart transplant recipients with asymptomatic antibody-mediated or stable mixed cellular and antibody-mediated rejection.

Authors:  Abdallah G Kfoury; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Gregory L Snow; Stavros G Drakos; Josef Stehlik; Patrick W Fisher; Bruce B Reid; Melanie D Everitt; Feras M Bader; Dale G Renlund
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Vascular (humoral) rejection in heart transplantation: pathologic observations and clinical implications.

Authors:  E H Hammond; R L Yowell; S Nunoda; R L Menlove; D G Renlund; M R Bristow; W A Gay; K W Jones; J B O'Connell
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

10.  Activation of intravascular macrophages within myocardial small vessels is a feature of acute vascular rejection in human heart transplants.

Authors:  N B Ratliff; J T McMahon
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.247

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.