Literature DB >> 23258635

The relationship between anogenital distance and age.

M L Eisenberg1, T-C Hsieh, L I Lipshultz.   

Abstract

In humans, recent studies have correlated anogenital distance (AGD) in adult men to intrinsic testicular function. Although rodent studies suggest that AGD is determined in utero and remains constant in adult life, it is not certain if AGD remains constant across a man's adult life. We sought to determine if adult male AGD varies based on age. A cross-sectional study of men being evaluated at a men's health clinic. Anogenital distance (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) and penile length (PL) were measured using digital callipers. anova and linear regression were used to determine correlations between AGD, fatherhood status and age. In all, 473 men were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43 ± 13 years. The mean AGD for the group was 39 ± 13 mm. Anogenital distance did not vary between age categories for the entire group, for fathers, and for childless men. Moreover, penile length also remained constant across age categories. On adjusted analyses stratified by fatherhood status, there was no relationship between AGDp and age. The current cross-sectional study demonstrates that anogenital distance, defined as the distance from the posterior scrotum to the anal verge, is similar for men of different ages. As such, AGD may provide a measure for genital development and function throughout adult life. However, confirmation with longitudinal studies is needed.
© 2012 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23258635     DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00019.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  8 in total

1.  Anogenital distance as a measure of human male fertility.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Anogenital distance and anal position index in cadaveric human fetuses.

Authors:  Hakan Taşkınlar; Özlem Elvan; Caner İsbir; İsa Kıllı; Ali Naycı
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.693

Review 3.  Anogenital distance and its application in environmental health research.

Authors:  Chunhua Liu; Xijin Xu; Xia Huo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  First trimester determination of fetal gender by ultrasonographic measurement of anogenital distance: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nazila Najdi; Fatemeh Safi; Shahrzad Hashemi-Dizaji; Ghazal Sahraian; Yahya Jand
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-03-03

5.  Stretched penile length and its associations with testosterone and infertility.

Authors:  Austen D Slade; Andrew R Christiansen; Sorena Keihani; William O Brant; James M Hotaling
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-01

6.  Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Fie Madvig; Marc Künkel Pedersen; Stine Kjaer Urhoj; Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner; Niels Jørgensen; Laerke Priskorn
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 7.  Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans.

Authors:  A Thankamony; V Pasterski; K K Ong; C L Acerini; I A Hughes
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 8.  Androgens and the masculinization programming window: human-rodent differences.

Authors:  Richard M Sharpe
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.407

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.