Literature DB >> 23257578

Noise and communication: a three-year update.

Anthony J Brammer1, Chantal Laroche.   

Abstract

Noise is omnipresent and impacts us all in many aspects of daily living. Noise can interfere with communication not only in industrial workplaces, but also in other work settings (e.g. open-plan offices, construction, and mining) and within buildings (e.g. residences, arenas, and schools). The interference of noise with communication can have significant social consequences, especially for persons with hearing loss, and may compromise safety (e.g. failure to perceive auditory warning signals), influence worker productivity and learning in children, affect health (e.g. vocal pathology, noise-induced hearing loss), compromise speech privacy, and impact social participation by the elderly. For workers, attempts have been made to: 1) Better define the auditory performance needed to function effectively and to directly measure these abilities when assessing Auditory Fitness for Duty, 2) design hearing protection devices that can improve speech understanding while offering adequate protection against loud noises, and 3) improve speech privacy in open-plan offices. As the elderly are particularly vulnerable to the effects of noise, an understanding of the interplay between auditory, cognitive, and social factors and its effect on speech communication and social participation is also critical. Classroom acoustics and speech intelligibility in children have also gained renewed interest because of the importance of effective speech comprehension in noise on learning. Finally, substantial work has been made in developing models aimed at better predicting speech intelligibility. Despite progress in various fields, the design of alarm signals continues to lag behind advancements in knowledge. This summary of the last three years' research highlights some of the most recent issues for the workplace, for older adults, and for children, as well as the effectiveness of warning sounds and models for predicting speech intelligibility. Suggestions for future work are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23257578     DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.104894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  4 in total

1.  Pilot study of methods and equipment for in-home noise level measurements.

Authors:  Richard L Neitzel; Maire S A Heikkinen; Christopher C Williams; Susan Marie Viet; Michael Dellarco
Journal:  Appl Acoust       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.639

2.  Does Asymmetric Hearing Loss Affect the Ability to Understand in Noisy Environments?

Authors:  Rafael Barona; Juan Antonio Vizcaino; Claudio Krstulovic; Luz Barona; Carmen Comeche; Jose Montalt; Mercedes Ubeda; Carolina Polo
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  Noise as an explanatory factor in work-related fatality reports.

Authors:  Pierre Deshaies; Richard Martin; Danny Belzile; Pauline Fortier; Chantal Laroche; Tony Leroux; Hugues Nélisse; Serge-André Girard; Robert Arcand; Maurice Poulin; Michel Picard
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

4.  A Bayesian network model to predict the role of hospital noise, annoyance, and sensitivity in quality of patient care.

Authors:  Milad Abbasi; Saied Yazdanirad; Mojtaba Zokaei; Mohsen Falahati; Nazila Eyvazzadeh
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-09-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.