| Literature DB >> 23256850 |
Jeremiah D Lancaster1, Budour Mohammad, Eyualem Abebe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extensive research effort has advanced our understanding of Caenorhabditis as a model system, but its natural association with bacteria remains to be explored in an ecological context. Explored associations vary vastly from mutualistic to parasitic. Serratia marcescens has been shown to be pathogenic to Caenorhabditis with a fitness cost. The recent isolation of an entomopathogenic Caenorhabditis briggsae KT0001/S. marcescens SCBI association from the wild has allowed us to examine under laboratory conditions whether such an association poses a serious cost to Caenorhabditis as previously surmised for other Serratia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23256850 PMCID: PMC3545906 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-688
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Figure 1Survivorship curve of fed on either or OP50. Curves represent the percentage of survivors as a function of time. Sample sizes were n = 46 (E. coli OP50) and n = 42 (S. marcescens).
Figure 2Fecundity of fed on either OP50 SCBI. Sample sizes were n = 46 (E. coli OP50) and n = 42 (S. marcescens SCBI).
Life table and fecundity schedule of fed on OP50 or SCBI
| | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 46.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 42.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1.00 | 46.00 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 42.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 2.00 | 46.00 | 1.00 | 27.63 | 27.63 | 55.26 | 42.00 | 1.00 | 10.57 | 10.57 | 21.14 |
| 3.00 | 45.00 | 0.98 | 31.62 | 30.94 | 92.81 | 39.00 | 0.93 | 32.85 | 30.50 | 91.50 |
| 4.00 | 42.00 | 0.91 | 37.98 | 34.67 | 138.69 | 38.00 | 0.90 | 39.71 | 35.93 | 143.72 |
| 5.00 | 39.00 | 0.85 | 11.90 | 10.09 | 50.43 | 37.00 | 0.88 | 24.41 | 21.50 | 107.50 |
| 6.00 | 38.00 | 0.83 | 1.42 | 1.17 | 7.04 | 37.00 | 0.88 | 7.19 | 6.33 | 38.00 |
| 7.00 | 35.00 | 0.76 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 5.02 | 35.00 | 0.83 | 1.86 | 1.55 | 10.83 |
| 8.00 | 29.00 | 0.63 | 0.38 | 0.24 | 1.91 | 30.00 | 0.71 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 1.14 |
| 9.00 | 23.00 | 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.59 | 20.00 | 0.48 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.43 |
| 10.00 | 14.00 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.65 | 13.00 | 0.31 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.48 |
| 11.00 | 9.00 | 0.20 | 3.00 | 0.59 | 6.46 | 9.00 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.26 |
| 12.00 | 4.00 | 0.09 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 6.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 13.00 | 3.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 14.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 15.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ∑ | 115.92 | 106.65 | 359.58 | 117.14 | 106.65 | 415.01 | ||||
The fixed time interval, x = age in days; nx = number of surviving individuals; lx = proportion of survivors remaining; mx = age-specific fecundity; ∑mx = total fertility rate (TFR); ∑lxmx = net reproductive rate (R0).