Literature DB >> 23255507

Axial computed tomography evaluation of the internal nasal valve correlates with clinical valve narrowing and patient complaint.

Jason A Moche1, Justin C Cohen, Steven J Pearlman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this work was to explore the utility of axial computed tomography (CT) imaging to objectively define a narrow internal nasal valve, and compare those findings with clinical examination and patient complaint.
METHODS: Retrospective review from a single facial plastic surgery center. We reviewed 40 consecutive patients evaluated for either sinusitis or nasal airway obstruction for which a CT scan was obtained at a single radiology institution. Thirty-six complete office records were examined for the presence of clinical internal valve narrowing and complaints of nasal obstruction. In total, 72 internal nasal valves were analyzed using axial plane CT and measurements were compared to clinical findings and presence of airway obstruction.
RESULTS: Measured valve areas for clinically normal internal nasal valves averaged 0.47 cm(2) vs 0.28 cm(2) for clinically narrow valves, a decrease of 40.4%. In unobstructed nasal airways the valve area averaged 0.51 cm(2) vs 0.38 cm(2) in obstructed airways, a difference of 25.5%. A radiographically measured valve area of <0.30 cm(2) suggests clinical narrowing with a sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 88.9%, positive predictive value of 62.5%, and negative predictive value of 92.3%.
CONCLUSION: Using standard axial CT imaging we describe an objective method of radiographically evaluating the nasal valve, demonstrating strong correlation with physical examination and patient complaint. Additionally, radiographic valve areas can be used to screen for clinically narrow nasal valves with good sensitivity and specificity, providing a novel straightforward method for nasal valve assessment.
© 2012 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axial imaging; computed tomography; internal nasal valve; nasal obstruction; patient complaint

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23255507     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  5 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Management of the Internal Nasal Valve: A Review of Surgical Approaches.

Authors:  Margaret A Sinkler; Chase J Wehrle; Joseph W Elphingstone; Emma Magidson; Edmond F Ritter; Jimmy J Brown
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Nasal Valve Reconstruction Using a Titanium Implant: An Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Neal D Goldman; Richard Alexander; Laura F Sandoval; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-03-22

3.  In vivo imaging of the internal nasal valve during different conditions using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Anna S Englhard; Maximilian Wiedmann; Georg J Ledderose; Bryan Lemieux; Alan Badran; Joseph C Jing; Zhongping Chen; Veronika Volgger; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Imaging of the internal nasal valve using long-range Fourier domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Anna S Englhard; Maximilian Wiedmann; Georg J Ledderose; Bryan Lemieux; Alan Badran; Zhongping Chen; Christian S Betz; Brian J Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Computed tomography evaluation of internal nasal valve angle and area and its correlation with NOSE scale for symptomatic improvement in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Amr G Shafik; Hussam Adel Alkady; Gehad Mohamed Tawfik; Ahmed Mostafa Mohamed; Tahany Mohamed Rabie; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.