Literature DB >> 23255117

4D imaging reveals a shift in chromosome segregation dynamics during mouse pre-implantation development.

Kazuo Yamagata1, Greg FitzHarris.   

Abstract

Cells of the early developing mammalian embryo frequently mis-segregate chromosomes during cell division, causing daughter cells to inherit an erroneous numbers of chromosomes. Why the embryo is so susceptible to errors is unknown, and the mechanisms that embryos employ to accomplish chromosome segregation are poorly understood. Chromosome segregation is performed by the spindle, a fusiform-shaped microtubule-based transient organelle. Here we present a detailed analysis of 4D fluorescence-confocal data sets of live embryos progressing from the one-cell embryo stage through to blastocyst in vitro, providing some of the first mechanistic insights into chromosome segregation in the mammalian embryo. We show that chromosome segregation occurs as a combined result of poleward chromosome motion (anaphase-A) and spindle elongation (anaphase-B), which occur simultaneously at the time of cell division. Unexpectedly, however, regulation of the two anaphase mechanisms changes significantly between the first and second embryonic mitoses. In one-cell embryos, the velocity of anaphase-A chromosome motion and the velocity and overall extent of anaphase-B spindle elongation are significantly constrained compared with later stages. As a result chromosomes are delivered close to the center of the forming two-cell stage blastomeres at the end of the first mitosis. In subsequent divisions, anaphase-B spindle elongation is faster and more extensive, resulting in the delivery of chromosomes to the distal plasma membrane of the newly forming blastomeres. Metaphase spindle length scales with cell size from the two-cell stage onwards, but is substantially shorter in the first mitosis than in the second mitosis, and the duration of mitosis-1 is substantially greater than subsequent divisions. Thus, there is a striking and unexpected shift in the approach to cell division between the first and second mitotic divisions, which likely reflects adaptations to the unique environment within the developing embryo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23255117      PMCID: PMC3570506          DOI: 10.4161/cc.23052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  45 in total

Review 1.  Spindle assembly in animal cells.

Authors:  D A Compton
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Centrosome separation and central spindle assembly act in redundant pathways that regulate microtubule density and trigger cleavage furrow formation.

Authors:  Reinhard Dechant; Michael Glotzer
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Dynamics of global gene expression changes during mouse preimplantation development.

Authors:  Toshio Hamatani; Mark G Carter; Alexei A Sharov; Minoru S H Ko
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 4.  How cells coordinate growth and division.

Authors:  Paul Jorgensen; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Model for anaphase B: role of three mitotic motors in a switch from poleward flux to spindle elongation.

Authors:  I Brust-Mascher; G Civelekoglu-Scholey; M Kwon; A Mogilner; J M Scholey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spindle microtubules in flux.

Authors:  Gregory C Rogers; Stephen L Rogers; David J Sharp
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 7.  The molecular requirements for cytokinesis.

Authors:  Michael Glotzer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Genetics of gametes and embryos.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Eugene Pergament; Joy D A Delhanty
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  The transition from meiotic to mitotic spindle assembly is gradual during early mammalian development.

Authors:  Aurélien Courtois; Melina Schuh; Jan Ellenberg; Takashi Hiiragi
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 10.  Cleavage furrow positioning.

Authors:  Michael Glotzer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  7 in total

1.  Micronucleus formation causes perpetual unilateral chromosome inheritance in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Cayetana Vázquez-Diez; Kazuo Yamagata; Shardul Trivedi; Jenna Haverfield; Greg FitzHarris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spindle Size Scaling Contributes to Robust Silencing of Mitotic Spindle Assembly Checkpoint.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Jian Liu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Position- and Hippo signaling-dependent plasticity during lineage segregation in the early mouse embryo.

Authors:  Eszter Posfai; Sophie Petropoulos; Flavia Regina Oliveira de Barros; John Paul Schell; Igor Jurisica; Rickard Sandberg; Fredrik Lanner; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Cell size and polarization determine cytokinesis furrow ingression dynamics in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Lia Mara Gomes Paim; Greg FitzHarris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Rapid assembly of a polar network architecture drives efficient actomyosin contractility.

Authors:  Vlad Costache; Serena Prigent Garcia; Camille N Plancke; Jing Li; Simon Begnaud; Shashi Kumar Suman; Anne-Cécile Reymann; Taeyoon Kim; François B Robin
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 9.995

6.  A non-canonical mode of microtubule organization operates throughout pre-implantation development in mouse.

Authors:  Katie Howe; Greg FitzHarris
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  A Balance between Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Volumes Controls Spindle Length.

Authors:  Lucia Novakova; Kristina Kovacovicova; Thanh Quang Dang-Nguyen; Martin Sodek; Michal Skultety; Martin Anger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.