Literature DB >> 23254803

Introduction to haptics for neurosurgeons.

Rachael L'Orsa1, Chris J B Macnab, Mahdi Tavakoli.   

Abstract

Robots are becoming increasingly relevant to neurosurgeons, extending a neurosurgeon's physical capabilities, improving navigation within the surgical landscape when combined with advanced imaging, and propelling the movement toward minimally invasive surgery. Most surgical robots, however, isolate surgeons from the full range of human senses during a procedure. This forces surgeons to rely on vision alone for guidance through the surgical corridor, which limits the capabilities of the system, requires significant operator training, and increases the surgeon's workload. Incorporating haptics into these systems, ie, enabling the surgeon to "feel" forces experienced by the tool tip of the robot, could render these limitations obsolete by making the robot feel more like an extension of the surgeon's own body. Although the use of haptics in neurosurgical robots is still mostly the domain of research, neurosurgeons who keep abreast of this emerging field will be more prepared to take advantage of it as it becomes more prevalent in operating theaters. Thus, this article serves as an introduction to the field of haptics for neurosurgeons. We not only outline the current and future benefits of haptics but also introduce concepts in the fields of robotic technology and computer control. This knowledge will allow readers to be better aware of limitations in the technology that can affect performance and surgical outcomes, and "knowing the right questions to ask" will be invaluable for surgeons who have purchasing power within their departments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23254803     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318273a1a3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current state-of-the-art and future perspectives of robotic technology in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei; Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez; Deepak Sambhara; Ehud Mendel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Radiological and clinical differences between robotic-assisted pedicle screw fixation with and without real-time optical tracking.

Authors:  Jinpeng Du; Lin Gao; Dageng Huang; Lequn Shan; Wentao Wang; Yong Fan; Dingjun Hao; Liang Yan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of accuracy and safety between robot-assisted and conventional fluoroscope assisted placement of pedicle screws in thoracolumbar spine: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chuntao Li; Wenyi Li; Shangju Gao; Can Cao; Changren Li; Liang He; Xu Ma; Meng Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Urovision 2020: The future of urology.

Authors:  Vivek Venkatramani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Simulation and resident education in spinal neurosurgery.

Authors:  Parker E Bohm; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-02-26

6.  Robot-assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Using Three-Dimensional Fluoroscopy: A Preliminary Clinical Study.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Ming-Xing Fan; Ya-Jun Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  A robot-assisted surgical system using a force-image control method for pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Xiaoguang Han; Bo Liu; Yajun Liu; Ying Hu; Xiao Han; Yunfeng Xu; Mingxing Fan; Haiyang Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Radiological and Clinical Differences between Tinavi Orthopedic Robot and O-Arm Navigation System in Thoracolumbar Screw Implantation for Reconstruction of Spinal Stability.

Authors:  Jinpeng Du; Lin Gao; Dageng Huang; Lequn Shan; Wentao Wang; Yong Fan; Dingjun Hao; Liang Yan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-09-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.