Literature DB >> 23254646

De-escalation of antimicrobial therapy for bacteraemia due to difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacilli.

N Shime1, T Kosaka, N Fujita.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the status and clinical outcome of de-escalating antimicrobial therapy for bacteraemia due to hospital-acquired, Gram-negative bacilli that are difficult to treat.
METHODS: Among 1,610 patients presenting with positive blood cultures collected at our medical centre over a 6-year period, 133 were infected with Serratia, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Citrobacter or Enterobacter sp. (SPACES). We examined the appropriateness of an empiric initial administration of antimicrobials based on in vitro sensitivity, and the success and outcomes of a pathogen-directed de-escalation of therapy. The treatment was considered to be successfully de-escalated when the antimicrobial spectrum was narrowed according to a spectrum ranking or when ≥ 2 antimicrobials prescribed initially were lowered to one agent. Outcome measures included persistent, recurrent and metastatic infections, infection-related deaths and cost of antimicrobials.
RESULTS: The treatment was initially appropriate in 79 of 133 patients (59 %), of whom 49 (62 %) were candidates for and 28 (57 %) underwent treatment de-escalation. No treatment failure was observed among these 28 patients, while 2 of 11 patients (18 %) whose treatment was not de-escalated died (p = 0.13). The median cost of antimicrobials was <euro>250/patient lower in the de-escalated than in the non-de-escalated group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial therapy for bacteraemia due to hard-to-treat SPACES was de-escalated in 57 % of candidates, based on the in vitro sensitivity, with no deaths and significantly lower costs of antimicrobial therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23254646     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-012-0388-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  28 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns among patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Marin H Kollef; Lee E Morrow; Michael S Niederman; Kenneth V Leeper; Antonio Anzueto; Lisa Benz-Scott; Frank J Rodino
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Use of several inducer and substrate antibiotic combinations in a disk approximation assay format to screen for AmpC induction in patient isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., and Serratia spp.

Authors:  W Michael Dunne; Daniel J Hardin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Septic shock in bacteremic patients: risk factors, features and prognosis.

Authors:  L Leibovici; M Drucker; H Konigsberger; Z Samra; S Harrari; S Ashkenazi; S D Pitlik
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1997

4.  Principles of antibiotic therapy in severe infections: optimizing the therapeutic approach by use of laboratory and clinical data.

Authors:  Stan Deresinski
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Correlation between antibiotic use and resistance in a hospital: temporary and ward-specific observations.

Authors:  I Willemsen; D Bogaers-Hofman; M Winters; J Kluytmans
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Impact of multiresistance of gram-negative bacteria in bloodstream infection on mortality rates and length of stay.

Authors:  A M Sostarich; D Zolldann; H Haefner; R Luetticken; R Schulze-Roebecke; S W Lemmen
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Development of a guideline for the management of ventilator-associated pneumonia based on local microbiologic findings and impact of the guideline on antimicrobial use practices.

Authors:  Timothy H Dellit; Jeannie D Chan; Shawn J Skerrett; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  De-escalation after empirical meropenem treatment in the intensive care unit: fiction or reality?

Authors:  Jan J De Waele; Mariska Ravyts; Pieter Depuydt; Stijn I Blot; Johan Decruyenaere; Dirk Vogelaers
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock--does the dose matter?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  8 in total

1.  De-escalation of empirical therapy is associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  J Garnacho-Montero; A Gutiérrez-Pizarraya; A Escoresca-Ortega; Y Corcia-Palomo; Esperanza Fernández-Delgado; I Herrera-Melero; C Ortiz-Leyba; J A Márquez-Vácaro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  De-escalation of antimicrobial therapy in critically ill hematology patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David Schnell; Claire Montlahuc; Fabrice Bruneel; Matthieu Resche-Rigon; Achille Kouatchet; Jean-Ralph Zahar; Michael Darmon; Frédéric Pene; Virginie Lemiale; Antoine Rabbat; François Vincent; Elie Azoulay; Djamel Mokart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  De-escalation versus continuation of empirical antimicrobial treatment in severe sepsis: a multicenter non-blinded randomized noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Marc Leone; Carole Bechis; Karine Baumstarck; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Jacques Albanèse; Samir Jaber; Alain Lepape; Jean-Michel Constantin; Laurent Papazian; Nicolas Bruder; Bernard Allaouchiche; Karine Bézulier; François Antonini; Julien Textoris; Claude Martin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for healthcare-associated pneumonia within the Veterans Healthcare Administration.

Authors:  Karl Madaras-Kelly; Makoto Jones; Richard Remington; Christina M Caplinger; Benedikt Huttner; Barbara Jones; Matthew Samore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with gram-negative infections: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gowri Raman; Esther Avendano; Samantha Berger; Vandana Menon
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Optimal screening strategies for healthcare associated infections in a multi-institutional setting.

Authors:  Aaron C Miller; Linnea A Polgreen; Philip M Polgreen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Strategies for appropriate antibiotic use in intensive care unit.

Authors:  Camila Delfino Ribeiro da Silva; Moacyr Silva Júnior
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-06-30

8.  Benefits and unintended consequences of antimicrobial de-escalation: Implications for stewardship programs.

Authors:  Josie Hughes; Xi Huo; Lindsey Falk; Amy Hurford; Kunquan Lan; Bryan Coburn; Andrew Morris; Jianhong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.