| Literature DB >> 23251612 |
Patrick Freund1, Torben Schneider, Zoltan Nagy, Chloe Hutton, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Karl Friston, Claudia A Wheeler-Kingshott, Alan J Thompson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to disruption of axons and macroscopic tissue loss. Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), we assessed degeneration of the corticospinal tract (CST) in the cervical cord above a traumatic lesion and explored its relationship with cervical atrophy, remote axonal changes within the cranial CST and upper limb function.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23251612 PMCID: PMC3520920 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Axial FA image of the cervical cord (C1–C3) showing the locations of the two ROIs superimposed on the anatomoical location of the left and right corticospinal tracts.
Note that ROIs were first drawn on the low diffusion weighted images (A) and then overlaid onto the diffusion maps (B).
Individual clinical and behavioural data for the SCI subjects with means.
| Subject | Age | Aetiology of the injury | Time since injury (years) | Level of motor impairment/ASIA | dh 9HPT | ndh 9HPT | MVC | ARAT |
| 1 | 43 | fracture | 14 | C6/D | 68.0 | 54.35 | 0.22 | 36.0 |
| 2 | 29 | fracture | 9 | C6/B | 52.6 | 59.2 | 0.05 | 42.0 |
| 3 | 44 | fracture | 7 | C7/C | 56.75 | 118.4 | 0.25 | 57.0 |
| 4 | 35 | fracture | 14 | C5/A | 190.5 | 300.0 | 0.02 | 26.0 |
| 5 | 61 | fracture | 19 | C6/A | 68.3 | 76.5 | 0.05 | 26.5 |
| 6 | 40 | disc prolapse | 19 | C5/C | 283 | 300.0 | 0.01 | 26.0 |
| 7 | 53 | fracture | 7 | C8/D | 38.55 | 42.45 | 0.25 | 53.0 |
| 8 | 56 | fracture | 15 | C5/D | 105.0 | 300.0 | 0.11 | 25.0 |
| 9 | 50 | fracture | 30 | C5/D | 21.8 | 20.1 | 0.22 | 57.0 |
| Mean | 45.7 | 14.9 | 98.3 | 141.2 | 0.13 | 38.72 | ||
| SD | 9.7 | 6.8 | 84.94 | 121.98 | 0.1 | 13.13 |
ASIA = American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale; dh = dominant hand; ndh = non-dominant hand; 9HPT = Nine Hole Peg Test; MVC = maximum voluntary contraction, ARAT = Arm Research Arm Test; SD = standard deviation.
Figure 2Box plots showing the statistically different mean FA in the region of interest in (A) the right corticospinal tract, (B) left corticospinal tract and (C) whole spinal cord area in controls and SCI patients.
Figure 3Scatter plots showing the correlations between spinal FA of the corticospinal tract and cord area and clinical measures in SCI subjects.
(A) FA of the whole cervical cord ROI vs. cross sectional spinal cord area, (B) Spinal FA of the right CST-ROI vs. dominant 9HPT score. Note that greater values of the 9HPT score represent better outcome.
Figure 4Statistical parametric maps (thresholded at p<0.01, uncorrected for display purposes only) showing the right internal capsule, in which changes in cranial FA of the corticospinal tract (CST) are more sensitive to spinal changes in FA of the mean CST compared with normal variability.
The colour bar represents the t-value.