Literature DB >> 23249409

Theoretical modeling of large molecular systems. Advances in the local self consistent field method for mixed quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations.

Antonio Monari1, Jean-Louis Rivail, Xavier Assfeld.   

Abstract

Molecular mechanics methods can efficiently compute the macroscopic properties of a large molecular system but cannot represent the electronic changes that occur during a chemical reaction or an electronic transition. Quantum mechanical methods can accurately simulate these processes, but they require considerably greater computational resources. Because electronic changes typically occur in a limited part of the system, such as the solute in a molecular solution or the substrate within the active site of enzymatic reactions, researchers can limit the quantum computation to this part of the system. Researchers take into account the influence of the surroundings by embedding this quantum computation into a calculation of the whole system described at the molecular mechanical level, a strategy known as the mixed quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) approach. The accuracy of this embedding varies according to the types of interactions included, whether they are purely mechanical or classically electrostatic. This embedding can also introduce the induced polarization of the surroundings. The difficulty in QM/MM calculations comes from the splitting of the system into two parts, which requires severing the chemical bonds that link the quantum mechanical subsystem to the classical subsystem. Typically, researchers replace the quantoclassical atoms, those at the boundary between the subsystems, with a monovalent link atom. For example, researchers might add a hydrogen atom when a C-C bond is cut. This Account describes another approach, the Local Self Consistent Field (LSCF), which was developed in our laboratory. LSCF links the quantum mechanical portion of the molecule to the classical portion using a strictly localized bond orbital extracted from a small model molecule for each bond. In this scenario, the quantoclassical atom has an apparent nuclear charge of +1. To achieve correct bond lengths and force constants, we must take into account the inner shell of the atom: for an sp(3) carbon atom, we consider the two core 1s electrons and treat that carbon as an atom with three electrons. This results in an LSCF+3 model. Similarly, a nitrogen atom with a lone pair of electrons available for conjugation is treated as an atom with five electrons (LSCF+5). This approach is particularly well suited to splitting peptide bonds and other bonds that include carbon or nitrogen atoms. To embed the induced polarization within the calculation, researchers must use a polarizable force field. However, because the parameters of the usual force fields include an average of the induction effects, researchers typically can obtain satisfactory results without explicitly introducing the polarization. When considering electronic transitions, researchers must take into account the changes in the electronic polarization. One approach is to simulate the electronic cloud of the surroundings by a continuum whose dielectric constant is equal to the square of the refractive index. This Electronic Response of the Surroundings (ERS) methodology allows researchers to model the changes in induced polarization easily. We illustrate this approach by modeling the electronic absorption of tryptophan in human serum albumin (HSA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23249409     DOI: 10.1021/ar300278j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  18 in total

1.  Iterative stochastic subspace self-consistent field method.

Authors:  Pierre-François Loos; Jean-Louis Rivail; Xavier Assfeld
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  UV-vis absorption spectrum of a novel Ru(II) complex intercalated in DNA: [Ru(2,2'-bipy)(dppz)(2,2'-ArPy)]⁺.

Authors:  Agisilaos Chantzis; Thibaut Very; Stéphane Despax; Jean-Thomas Issenhuth; Alex Boeglin; Pascal Hébraud; Michel Pfeffer; Antonio Monari; Xavier Assfeld
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Revealing quantum mechanical effects in enzyme catalysis with large-scale electronic structure simulation.

Authors:  Zhongyue Yang; Rimsha Mehmood; Mengyi Wang; Helena W Qi; Adam H Steeves; Heather J Kulik
Journal:  React Chem Eng       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.239

4.  Large-scale QM/MM free energy simulations of enzyme catalysis reveal the influence of charge transfer.

Authors:  Heather J Kulik
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  QM/MM through the 1990s: The First Twenty Years of Method Development and Applications.

Authors:  Meiyi Liu; Yingjie Wang; Yakun Chen; Martin J Field; Jiali Gao
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Accurate simulation of geometry, singlet-singlet and triplet-singlet excitation of cyclometalated iridium(III) complex.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Fu-Quan Bai; Bao-Hui Xia; Hong-Xing Zhang; Tian Cui
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Development and application of quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics methods with advanced polarizable potentials.

Authors:  Jorge Nochebuena; Sehr Naseem-Khan; G Andrés Cisneros
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-12

8.  Projected hybrid orbitals: a general QM/MM method.

Authors:  Yingjie Wang; Jiali Gao
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Staring at the Naked Goddess: Unraveling the Structure and Reactivity of Artemis Endonuclease Interacting with a DNA Double Strand.

Authors:  Cécilia Hognon; Antonio Monari
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Understanding DNA under oxidative stress and sensitization: the role of molecular modeling.

Authors:  Elise Dumont; Antonio Monari
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.