Literature DB >> 2324880

The accuracy of test weighing for preterm infants.

P P Meier1, T Y Lysakowski, J L Engstrom, K L Kavanaugh, H H Mangurten.   

Abstract

A series of recent studies has suggested that preterm infants are capable of breast feeding at weights less than 1,500 g. However, estimating intake during breast feeding for these small infants is important for safe clinical practice and valid research. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of test weighing as an estimate of intake for preterm infants using two types of scales: a mechanical scale (Toledo) commonly used in many special care nurseries, and a new electronic scale (SMART; Olympic Medical). Fifty clinically stable preterm infants, weighing between 1,088 and 2,440 g (mean = 1,599 g), who were clothed identically for all weights and feedings, were studied. Two experienced neonatal nurses (RN-1 and RN-2) collected the data. Before feeding, each infant was weighed once on each scale by each nurse; the order of nurse and scale was assigned randomly. Then, RN-1 administered a prescribed volume of feeding. After feeding, RN-2 weighed each infant twice on each scale; the order of scale was assigned randomly. RN-1 was blind to postfeed weights, and RN-2 was blind to actual volume of intake. Results indicated that differences between the actual and estimated volumes of intake were smaller for the electronic than for the mechanical scale on all measures. These findings suggest that test weighing with an electronic scale provides an accurate estimate of intake for preterm infants, and support the use of this instrument in clinical practice and research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2324880     DOI: 10.1097/00005176-199001000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  8 in total

1.  Test weighing for term and premature infants is an accurate procedure.

Authors:  Paula P Meier; Janet L Engstrom
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Improving the use of human milk during and after the NICU stay.

Authors:  Paula P Meier; Janet L Engstrom; Aloka L Patel; Briana J Jegier; Nicholas E Bruns
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  Compromised weight gain, milk intake, and feeding behavior in breastfed newborns of depressive mothers.

Authors:  Sybil L Hart; Shera C Jackson; L Mallory Boylan
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2011-06-03

4.  Accuracy and precision of test weighing to assess milk intake in newborn infants.

Authors:  O E M Savenije; P L P Brand
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 5.  Management of breastfeeding during and after the maternity hospitalization for late preterm infants.

Authors:  Paula Meier; Aloka L Patel; Karen Wright; Janet L Engstrom
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.430

6.  Infant sex differences in human milk intake and composition from 1- to 3-month post-delivery in a healthy United States cohort.

Authors:  Erin K Eckart; Jennifer D Peck; Elyse O Kharbanda; Emily M Nagel; David A Fields; Ellen W Demerath
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.533

7.  Estimating the dietary intake of breastfeeding preterm infants.

Authors:  Sarah Greenslade; Jacqueline Miller; Emma Tonkin; Peter Marshall; Carmel T Collins
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Development and Application of the Remote Food Photography Method to Measure Food Intake in Exclusively Milk Fed Infants: A Laboratory-Based Study.

Authors:  Abby D Altazan; L Anne Gilmore; Jeffrey H Burton; Shelly A Ragusa; John W Apolzan; Corby K Martin; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.