Literature DB >> 23247931

[Controversies in TL classifications. What are we actually treating? Some perspectives on the evolution of spine fracture classification systems].

C Bellabarba1, F Zhang, T Wagner.   

Abstract

Classification systems can be helpful in our understanding and management of disease states. In spine trauma and thoracolumbar injuries specifically, there is still a fragmentation of concepts between more descriptive term-based and severity-based scoring systems. In thoracolumbar injury care we as a spine community are perhaps closer than other subspecialty areas in arriving at a globally acceptable"universal" classification system; however, more work needs to be done and all of us have to be willing to open our minds in evaluating and adopting a new approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23247931     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-012-2306-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  10 in total

Review 1.  Classifications of thoracic and lumbar fractures: rationale and supporting data.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza; Amer J Mirza; Jens R Chapman; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons.

Authors:  Kirkham B Wood; Gaurav Khanna; Alexander R Vaccaro; Paul M Arnold; Mitchel B Harris; Amir A Mehbod
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Alexander R Vaccaro; Steven C Zeiller; R John Hulbert; Paul A Anderson; Mitchel Harris; Rune Hedlund; James Harrop; Marcel Dvorak; Kirkham Wood; Michael G Fehlings; Charles Fisher; Ronald A Lehman; D Greg Anderson; Christopher M Bono; Timothy Kuklo; F C Oner
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-06

4.  A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status.

Authors:  Alexander R Vaccaro; Ronald A Lehman; R John Hurlbert; Paul A Anderson; Mitchel Harris; Rune Hedlund; James Harrop; Marcel Dvorak; Kirkham Wood; Michael G Fehlings; Charles Fisher; Steven C Zeiller; D Greg Anderson; Christopher M Bono; Gordon H Stock; Andrew K Brown; Timothy Kuklo; F C Oner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries.

Authors:  F Denis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility. A study of 53 patients using CT and MRI.

Authors:  F C Oner; L M P Ramos; R K J Simmermacher; P T D Kingma; C H Diekerhof; W J A Dhert; A J Verbout
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification.

Authors:  P C McAfee; H A Yuan; B E Fredrickson; J P Lubicky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  A mechanistic classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  R L Ferguson; B L Allen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries.

Authors:  F Magerl; M Aebi; S D Gertzbein; J Harms; S Nazarian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Laurent Audigé; Beate Hanson; Jens R Chapman; Allard J F Hosman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.