| Literature DB >> 23247526 |
Antonella Penna1, Penna Antonella1, Luca Galluzzi, Galluzzi Luca.
Abstract
In the last decade, various molecular methods (e.g., fluorescent hybridization assay, sandwich hybridization assay, automatized biosensor detection, real-time PCR assay) have been developed and implemented for accurate and specific identification and estimation of marine toxic microalgal species. This review focuses on the recent quantitative real-time PCR (qrt-PCR) technology developed for the control and monitoring of the most important taxonomic phytoplankton groups producing biotoxins with relevant negative impact on human health, the marine environment, and related economic activities. The high specificity and sensitivity of the qrt-PCR methods determined by the adequate choice of the genomic target gene, nucleic acid purification protocol, quantification through the standard curve, and type of chemical detection method make them highly efficient and therefore applicable to harmful algal bloom phenomena. Recent development of qrt-PCR-based assays using the target gene of toxins, such as saxitoxin compounds, has allowed more precise quantification of toxigenic species (i.e., Alexandrium catenella) abundance. These studies focus only on toxin-producing species in the marine environment. Therefore, qrt-PCR technology seems to offer the advantages of understanding the ecology of harmful algal bloom species and facilitating the management of their outbreaks.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23247526 PMCID: PMC3782655 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1377-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Qrt-PCR applications for detection and estimation of marine harmful algal bloom species
| Taxa | Target gene copy number cell−1 | Standard curve method | Nucleic acid purification method | Target genomic region | Detection method | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinoflagellates | ||||||
| | 1,084 ± 120.3 | Plasmid | Cell lysates | ITS-5.8S | SYBR Green | Galluzzi et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Kit extraction | ITS-5.8S | Hybridization probe | Touzet et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Phenol | LSU (D1/D2) | TaqMan probe | Hosoi-Tanabe and Sako ( |
| | n.d. | Cyst | Phenol/CTAB | LSU (D1/D2) | TaqMan probe | Kamikawa et al. ( |
| | 2,489,800 ± 550,96–219,170 ± 25,98 | Plasmid | Cell lysates | ITS-5.8S | SYBR Green | Galluzzi et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Cell lysates | LSU (D1/D2) | TaqMan probe | Garneau et al. ( |
| | 178–280 | Cellular PCR products | CTAB |
| Evagreen | Murray et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Kit extraction | LSU | SYBR Green | Dyrhmann et al. ( |
| | 28,402 ± 6152 | Cyst | Kit extraction | LSU (D1/D2) | SYBR Green | Erdner et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Phenol | LSU (D1/D2) | TaqMan probe | Hosoi-Tanabe and Sako ( |
| | n.d. | Cyst | CTAB | LSU (D1/D2) | TaqMan probe | Kamikawa et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cyst | Phenol/CTAB | LSU (D1/D2) | TaqMan probe | Kamikawa et al. ( |
| | 1,345 ± 780–33,930 ± 4,820 | Plasmid | Cell lysates | ITS-5.8S | SYBR Green | Galluzzi et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | CTAB | LSU (D1/D2) | Fluorescent hybridization probe | Kamikawa et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Phenol | ITS2 | TaqMan probe | Park et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Kit extraction | ITS | TaqMan probe | Park et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid | Kit extraction | LSU (D1/D2) | Fluorescent hybridization probe | Kavanagh et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid | Kit extraction | LSU (D1/D2) | Fluorescent hybridization probe | Kavanagh et al. ( |
| | ||||||
| | LSU (D1/D3) | |||||
| | n.d. | Cellular | Kit extraction | SSU | SYBR Green | |
| | 5.8S | Vandersea et al. ( | ||||
| | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| | n.d. | Cellular | CTAB | LSU (D1/D2) | Fluorescent hybridization probe | Kamikawa et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid cellular | CTAB | SSU | TaqMan probe | Handy et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid | CTAB | LSU | TaqMan probe | Bowers et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | CTAB | LSU (D1/D2) | Fluorescent hybridization probe | Kamikawa et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Cell lysates | SSU | Molecular beacon | Moorthi et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Kit extraction |
| Molecular beacon | Casper et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | CTAB | LSU (D1/D2) | Fluorescent Hybridization probe | Kamikawa et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Kit extraction |
| Molecular beacon | Ulrich et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Phenol | ITS-5.8S | TaqMan probe | Yuan et al. ( |
| | 1,030 ± 49 | Plasmid cellular | Cell lysates | LSU (D1/D2) | SYBR Green | Perini et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | CTAB | mt Cob, SSU | SYBR Green | Lin et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | CTAB | mt Cob, SSU | SYBR Green | Zhang and Lin ( |
| Raphidophyceae | ||||||
| | n.d. | Cellular | CTAB | LSU (D1/D2) | Fluorescent Hybridization probe | Kamikawa et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid | CTAB | SSU | TaqMan probe | Bowers et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid cellular | CTAB | SSU | TaqMan probe | Handy et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid | CTAB | ITS2 | TaqMan probe | Bowers et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid | CTAB | ITS2 | TaqMan probe | Bowers et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid | CTAB | ITS2 | TaqMan probe | Bowers et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid cellular | CTAB | SSU | TaqMan probe | Handy et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Plasmid | CTAB | LSU | TaqMan probe | Bowers et al. ( |
| Haptophyceae | ||||||
| | 10 ± 2.8–15.6 ± 1.6 | Plasmid | Cell lysates | ITS2 | SYBR Green | Galluzzi et al. ( |
| | 11.7 ± 0.6 | Plasmid | Cell lysates | ITS2 | SYBR Green | Zamor et al. ( |
| Pelagophyceae | ||||||
| | n.d. | Cellular | CTAB | SSU | Hybridization probe | Popels et al. ( |
| Diatoms | ||||||
| | n.d. | Plasmid | Cell lysates | SSU | SYBR Green | Fitzpatrick et al. ( |
| | n.d. | Cellular | Kit extraction | ITS-5.8S | SYBR Green | Andrée et al. ( |
| | 30,000 | Transcript | Kit extraction |
| TaqMan probe, beacon | Delaney et al. ( |
n.d not detected
Fig. 1Examples of amplification plots generated from dilutions of a target sequence (LSU rDNA from Ostreopsis cf. ovata) cloned into a plasmid (a) and from O. cf. ovata cell dilutions (b). The corresponding standard curves (c, d) were obtained by the correlation of C t values and log10 input plasmid copies or environmental cell number, respectively. Adapted from Perini et al. (2011)