Literature DB >> 23246277

Radiographic results of fully uncemented trabecular metal reverse shoulder system at 1 and 2 years' follow-up.

Andrew Bogle1, Matthew Budge, Adam Richman, Richard J Miller, J Michael Wiater, Ilya Voloshin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term radiographic outcome of a fully uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the radiographs of 98 consecutive patients undergoing uncemented RTSA. All patients had a standardized series of radiographs taken at 2 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Humeral stems were evaluated for radiolucent lines by zone and component subsidence. Evaluation for scapular notching and radiolucency surrounding the baseplate implant within the glenoid vault was also performed.
RESULTS: At 1 year, 93.9% of humeral stems had no lucent lines and 6.1% had less than 2 mm of lucency. Of the scapulae, 76.6% showed no evidence of notching, 21.4% had type 1 scapular notching, and 2.0% had type 2 notching at 1 year. At 2 years, 89.5% of humeral stem components had no lucent lines and 10.5% had less than 2 mm of lucency. Fifty-seven percent of scapulae had no notching, 34.2% had type 1 notching, 5.3% had type 2 notching, and 2.6% had type 3 notching. No stems had lucency in more than 1 zone or lucency ≥ 2 mm; 9.2% had subsidence of 2 mm or less. No glenoid components had any lucency around the baseplate or screws.
CONCLUSIONS: Cementless trabecular metal porous-coated implants for RTSA are associated with secure glenoid fixation and minimal radiographic evidence of humeral stem loosening or subsidence at short-term follow-up. The rates of scapular notching found in our study are comparable to previous studies and did not affect implant stability.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23246277     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  11 in total

1.  Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Derek D Berglund; Dragomir Mijic; Tsun Yee Law; Jennifer Kurowicki; Samuel Rosas; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Paul DeVito; Dimitri S Tahal; Dragomir Mijc; Bijan Ameri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Uncemented versus cemented humeral stem fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph J King; Kevin W Farmer; Aimee M Struk; Thomas W Wright
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Cemented or uncemented stem?

Authors:  Yaiza Lopiz; Carlos García-Fernandez; María Vallejo-Carrasco; Daniel Garriguez-Pérez; Loreto Achaerandio; Carmen Tesoro-Gonzalo; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Prospective multicentre mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 159 reverse total shoulder replacements and assessment of the influence of post-operative complications.

Authors:  Mohamed A Imam; Jörg Neumann; Werner Siebert; Sabine Mai; Olivier Verborgt; Franziska Eckers; Leo Jacobs; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-12-20

6.  Radiographic and clinical outcomes of second generation Trabecular Metal™ glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raymond E Chen; Alexander M Brown; Alexander S Greenstein; Sandeep Mannava; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-03-24

7.  Glenoid bone loss in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amar Malhas; Abbas Rashid; Dave Copas; Steve Bale; Ian Trail
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-05-06

8.  Long - Term survivorship and clinical and radiological follow - up of the primary uncemented Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Johannes H M van Ochten; Marco van der Pluijm; Martin Pouw; Quinten T M Felsch; Petra Heesterbeek; Maarten J de Vos
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-03-24

Review 9.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 10.  Radiological changes, infections and neurological complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: Part II.

Authors:  Marko Nabergoj; Patrick J Denard; Philippe Collin; Rihard Trebše; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.