Literature DB >> 23246016

Quantitative therapy response assessment by volumetric iodine-uptake measurement: initial experience in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

Xu Dai1, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Bernhard Schmidt, Karolin Höh, Ke Xu, Tom M Ganten, Maria-Katharina Ganten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the volumetric iodine-uptake (VIU) changes by dual-energy CT (DECT) in assessing the response to sorafenib treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, compared with AASLD (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases) and Choi criteria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with HCC receiving sorafenib, monitored with contrast-enhanced DECT scans at baseline and a minimum of one follow-up (8-12 weeks) were retrospectively evaluated. 30 target lesions in total were analyzed for tumor response according to VIU and adapted Choi criteria and compared with the standard AASLD.
RESULTS: According to AASLD criteria, 67% target lesions showed disease control: partial response (PR) in 3% and stable disease (SD) in 63%. 33% lesions progressed (PD). Disease control rate presented by VIU (60%) was similar to AASLD (67%) and Choi (63%) (P>0.05). For disease control group, change in mean VIU was from 149.5 ± 338.3mg to 108.5 ± 284.1mg (decreased 19.1 ± 42.9%); and for progressive disease group, change in mean VIU was from 163.7 ± 346.7 mg to 263.9 ± 537.2 mg (increased 230.5 ± 253.1%). Compared to AASLD (PR, 3%), VIU and Choi presented more PR (33% and 30%, respectively) in disease control group (P<0.05). VIU has moderate consistency with both AASLD (kappa=0.714; P<0.005) and Choi (kappa=0.648; P<0.005), while VIU showed a better consistency and correlation with AASLD (kappa=0.714; P<0.005; r=0.666, P<0.005) than Choi with AASLD (kappa=0.634, P<0.005; r=0.102, P=0.296).
CONCLUSION: VIU measurements by DECT can evaluate the disease control consistent with the current standard AASLD. Measurements are semi-automatic and therefore easy and robust to apply. As VIU reflects vital tumor burden in HCC, it is likely to be an optimal tumor response biomarker in HCC.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23246016     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  20 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments of dual-energy CT in oncology.

Authors:  David Simons; Marc Kachelriess; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Locally advanced gastric cancer: total iodine uptake to predict the response of primary lesion to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xiaoyuan Gao; Yang Zhang; Fei Yuan; Bei Ding; Qianchen Ma; Wenjie Yang; Jing Yan; Lianjun Du; Baisong Wang; Fuhua Yan; Martin Sedlmair; Zilai Pan; Huan Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Dual energy CT allows for improved characterization of response to antiangiogenic treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

Authors:  K Hellbach; A Sterzik; W Sommer; M Karpitschka; N Hummel; J Casuscelli; M Ingrisch; M Schlemmer; A Graser; Michael Staehler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Can dual-energy CT replace perfusion CT for the functional evaluation of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?

Authors:  Sébastien Mulé; Frédéric Pigneur; Ronan Quelever; Arthur Tenenhaus; Laurence Baranes; Philippe Richard; Vania Tacher; Edouard Herin; Hugo Pasquier; Maxime Ronot; Alain Rahmouni; Valérie Vilgrain; Alain Luciani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Dual-energy CT: theoretical principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  Andrea Agostini; Alessandra Borgheresi; Alberto Mari; Chiara Floridi; Federico Bruno; Marina Carotti; Nicolò Schicchi; Antonio Barile; Stefania Maggi; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Advanced CT techniques for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Yukiko Honda; Fuminari Tatsugami; Chihiro Tani; Wataru Fukumoto; Keigo Narita; Shota Kondo; Motonori Akagi; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  How accurate and precise are CT based measurements of iodine concentration? A comparison of the minimum detectable concentration difference among single source and dual source dual energy CT in a phantom study.

Authors:  André Euler; Justin Solomon; Maciej A Mazurowski; Ehsan Samei; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Dual-energy computed tomography for the assessment of early treatment effects of regorafenib in a preclinical tumor model: comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and conventional contrast-enhanced single-energy CT.

Authors:  Gesine Knobloch; Gregor Jost; Alexander Huppertz; Bernd Hamm; Hubertus Pietsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Quantification of Iodine Concentration Using Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in a Calf Liver.

Authors:  Andrea Agostini; Usman Mahmood; Yusuf Erdi; Alessandra Borgheresi; Monica Ragucci; Peter Sawan; Davinia Ryan; Maria Elena Laino; Giuseppe Corrias; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Dual-energy CT in diffuse liver disease: is there a role?

Authors:  Khaled Y Elbanna; Bahar Mansoori; Achille Mileto; Patrik Rogalla; Luís S Guimarães
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.