BACKGROUND: Functional brain imaging of young people at increased genetic risk for bipolar disorder provides a means of identifying potential endophenotypes for this condition. Dysfunctional neural mechanisms for the cognitive control of emotion are implicated in the genetic predisposition to bipolar disorder, with aberrant activity in frontocortical, striatal, and limbic brain regions previously reported in subjects with established bipolar disorder during inhibitory and emotion processing tasks. METHODS: Functional brain activity during inhibition of emotional material in young people at increased genetic risk for bipolar disorder was investigated using a facial-emotion go/no-go task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Data from 47 genetically high-risk individuals aged 18 to 30 years with at least one first-degree relative with bipolar disorder were compared with 49 control subjects (within the same age range but without a family history of bipolar disorder or other severe mental illness). RESULTS: Whole-brain corrected analyses revealed a highly specific and significant lack of recruitment of the inferior frontal gyrus when inhibiting responses to fearful faces in the high-risk participants compared with control subjects (p = .011, family-wise error, peak voxel). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired inhibitory function of the inferior frontal cortex may represent a trait marker of vulnerability to bipolar disorder. That this finding was revealed during inhibition of emotional material further implicates dysregulated frontolimbic brain networks as a potential neurocognitive endophenotype for bipolar disorder and provides evidence for pre-existing functional disturbances in those at high genetic risk for bipolar disorder.
BACKGROUND: Functional brain imaging of young people at increased genetic risk for bipolar disorder provides a means of identifying potential endophenotypes for this condition. Dysfunctional neural mechanisms for the cognitive control of emotion are implicated in the genetic predisposition to bipolar disorder, with aberrant activity in frontocortical, striatal, and limbic brain regions previously reported in subjects with established bipolar disorder during inhibitory and emotion processing tasks. METHODS: Functional brain activity during inhibition of emotional material in young people at increased genetic risk for bipolar disorder was investigated using a facial-emotion go/no-go task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Data from 47 genetically high-risk individuals aged 18 to 30 years with at least one first-degree relative with bipolar disorder were compared with 49 control subjects (within the same age range but without a family history of bipolar disorder or other severe mental illness). RESULTS: Whole-brain corrected analyses revealed a highly specific and significant lack of recruitment of the inferior frontal gyrus when inhibiting responses to fearful faces in the high-risk participants compared with control subjects (p = .011, family-wise error, peak voxel). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired inhibitory function of the inferior frontal cortex may represent a trait marker of vulnerability to bipolar disorder. That this finding was revealed during inhibition of emotional material further implicates dysregulated frontolimbic brain networks as a potential neurocognitive endophenotype for bipolar disorder and provides evidence for pre-existing functional disturbances in those at high genetic risk for bipolar disorder.
Authors: Leonardo L Gollo; Andrew Zalesky; R Matthew Hutchison; Martijn van den Heuvel; Michael Breakspear Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Leslie A Hulvershorn; Jennifer King; Patrick O Monahan; Holly C Wilcox; Philip B Mitchell; Janice M Fullerton; Howard J Edenberg; Gloria M P Roberts; Masoud Kamali; Anne L Glowinski; Neera Ghaziuddin; Melvin McInnis; Priya A Iyer-Eimerbrink; John I Nurnberger Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Melissa A Brotman; Christen M Deveney; Laura A Thomas; Kendra E Hinton; Jennifer Y Yi; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Danella M Hafeman; Henry W Chase; Kelly Monk; Lisa Bonar; Mary Beth Hickey; Alicia McCaffrey; Simona Graur; Anna Manelis; Cecile D Ladouceur; John Merranko; David A Axelson; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Boris Birmaher; Mary L Phillips Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Nancy E Adleman; Jennifer Y Yi; Christen M Deveney; Amanda E Guyer; Ellen Leibenluft; Melissa A Brotman Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: David Pagliaccio; Jillian Lee Wiggins; Nancy E Adleman; Elizabeth Harkins; Alexa Curhan; Kenneth E Towbin; Melissa A Brotman; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Manpreet K Singh; Kiki D Chang; Ryan G Kelley; Manish Saggar; Allan L Reiss; Ian H Gotlib Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 6.744