| Literature DB >> 23243384 |
Shawn Hancock1, Erik Bowman, Jyothiprashanth Prabakaran, Mark Benson, Rashmi Agni, Patrick Pfau, Mark Reichelderfer, Jennifer Weiss, Deepak Gopal.
Abstract
Background. i-scan is a software-driven technology that allows modifications of sharpness, hue, and contrast to enhance mucosal imaging. It uses postimage acquisition software with real-time mapping technology embedded in the endoscopic processor. Aims. To review applications of i-scan technology in clinical endoscopic practice. Methods. This is a case series of 20 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic procedures where i-scan image enhancement algorithms were applied. The main outcome measures were to compare mucosal lesions with high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) and i-scan image enhancement for the application of diagnostic sampling and therapy. Results. 13 cases involving the upper GI tract and 7 cases of the lower GI tract are included. For upper GI tract pathology i-scan assisted in diagnosis or therapy of Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia, esophageal adenocarcinoma, HSV esophagitis, gastric MALT lymphoma, gastric antral intestinal metaplasia with dysplasia, duodenal follicular lymphoma, and a flat duodenal adenoma. For lower GI tract pathology i-scan assisted in diagnosis or therapy of right-sided serrated adenomas, flat tubular adenoma, rectal adenocarcinoma, anal squamous cell cancer, solitary rectal ulcer, and radiation proctitis. Conclusions. i-scan imaging provides detailed topography of mucosal surfaces and delineates lesion edges, which can directly impact endoscopic management.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23243384 PMCID: PMC3518095 DOI: 10.1155/2012/193570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Ther Endosc ISSN: 1026-714X
Figure 1Principles of tone enhancement used by the postimage acquisition software in the endoscopic processor in i-scan technology. (Courtesy of Pentax Imaging, Pentax of America Montvale, NJ, USA).
Cases in which i-scan imaging highlighted mucosal abnormalities not as clearly seen with white light endoscopy and subsequently affected management.
| Case no. | Diagnosis | i-scan mode | Mucosal image | Impact on management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esophagus | ||||
| (1) | BE with HGD | 1, 3 | Nodule of HGD | Targeted EMR |
| (2) | BE with LGD | 1, 2 | Nodule of LGD | Targeted EMR |
| (3) | BE with HGD | 1, 2, 3 | Nodularity with HGD | Targeted EMR |
| (4) | BE with HGD | 1, 2 | Nodularity with HGD | Targeted EMR |
| (5) | BE with HGD | 1, 2, 3 | Nodularity with HGD | Targeted EMR |
| (6) | Esophageal cancer | 1, 2, 3 | Accentuated abnormal tissue | Targeted EMR |
| (7) | HSV esophagitis | 1, 2, 3 | Deep ulcerations | Targeted biopsy |
|
| ||||
| Stomach | ||||
| (8) | Gastric MALT lymphoma | 1, 3 | Gastric folds mucosal abnormality | Targeted EMR |
| (9) | CAG with intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia | 1, 2, 3 | Highlighted gastric thickening and nodularity | Subtotal gastrectomy |
|
| ||||
| Small intestine | ||||
| (10) | Periampullary follicular lymphoma | 1, 2 | Identified extent of involvement | Prevented unnecessary ampullectomy |
| (11) | Duodenal adenoma with dysplasia | 1, 2, 3 | Highlighted flat polyp margins | Complete EMR |
| (12) | Grade 1-2 submucosal follicular lymphoma | 1, 2 | Highlighted lymphoid appearance | Targeted EMR and prevention of surgical excision |
| (13) | Low-grade follicular lymphoma | 1, 2 | Highlighted nodular area | Targeted biopsy |
|
| ||||
| Colon and rectum | ||||
| (14) | Serrated adenoma | 1, 2 | Margins of polyp | Polyp detection and polypectomy |
| (15) | Serrated adenoma | 2 | Accentuated borders of right-sided polyp | Complete polypectomy |
| (16) | Tubular adenoma | 1, 2 | Detailed border of polyp | R hemicolectomy |
| (17) | Anal SCCa T1N0 | 1, 2 | Identified mucosal abnormality in anal canal | Targeted Bx |
| (18) | Rectal adenocarcinoma T1N0 | 1, 2, 3 | Identified borders of flat “depressed” rectal polyp | Targeted complete polypectomy |
| (19) | Radiation proctitis | 1 | Identified extent of involvement | Allowed for more diffuse APC |
| (20) | Solitary rectal ulcer | 1, 2 | Accentuated subtle ulcer | Targeted Bx |
Abbreviations: BE: Barrett's esophagus, LGD: low-grade dysplasia, HGD: high-grade dysplasia, EMR: endoscopic mucosal resection, HSV: herpes simplex virus, MALT: mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, CAG: chronic active gastritis, SCCa: squamous cell carcinoma, and APC: argon plasma coagulation.
Figure 2Barrett's esophagus with nodularity and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) visualized with HD-WLE (a), i-scan mode 1 (b) and (c), and i-scan mode 3 (d). Histopathology of EMR specimen showing Barrett's esophagus with HGD, H&E stain, and 400x magnification (e).
Figure 3Raised nodule of adenocarcinoma within a segment of Barrett's esophagus as seen with HD-WLE (a), i-scan mode 1 (b), i-scan mode 2 (c), and i-scan mode 3 (d).
Figure 4Gastric mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma visualized with HD-WLE (a), i-scan mode 1 (b), and i-scan mode 3 (c). Histopathology showing MALT lymphoma, H&E stain, and 400x magnification (d).
Figure 5Sessile serrated polyp visualized under HD-WLE (a) and with i-scan mode 2 (b).
Figure 6Large rectal polyp with focus of adenocarcinoma, visualized with HD-WLE (a), i-scan mode 1 (b), i-scan mode 2 (c), and i-scan mode 3 (d).