Me Lacruz1, Rt Emeny, H Bickel, B Linkohr, Kh Ladwig. 1. Institute of Epidemiology II, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Test the feasibility of the modified telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS-m) as a screening tool to detect cognitive impairment in a population-based sample of older subjects. METHODS: Data were collected from 3,578 participants, age 65-94 years, of the KORA-Age study. We used analysis of covariance to test for significant sex, age and educational differences in raw TICS-m scores. Internal consistency was analysed by assessing Cronbach's alpha. Correction for education years was undertaken, and participants were divided in three subgroups following validated cut-offs. Finally, a logistic regression was performed to determine the impact of sex on cognition subgroups. RESULTS: Internal consistency of the TICS-m was 0.78. Study participants needed approximately 5.4 min to complete the interview. Lower raw TICS-m scores were associated with male sex, older age and lower education (all p < 0.0001). After correction for education years, 2,851 (79%) had a non-impaired cognitive status (score >31). Male sex was independently associated with having a score equal to or below 27 and 31 (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5 and OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The TICS-m is a feasible questionnaire for community-dwelling older adults with normal cognitive function or moderate cognitive impairment. Lower cognitive performance was associated with being a man, being older, and having fewer years of formal education.
OBJECTIVE: Test the feasibility of the modified telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS-m) as a screening tool to detect cognitive impairment in a population-based sample of older subjects. METHODS: Data were collected from 3,578 participants, age 65-94 years, of the KORA-Age study. We used analysis of covariance to test for significant sex, age and educational differences in raw TICS-m scores. Internal consistency was analysed by assessing Cronbach's alpha. Correction for education years was undertaken, and participants were divided in three subgroups following validated cut-offs. Finally, a logistic regression was performed to determine the impact of sex on cognition subgroups. RESULTS: Internal consistency of the TICS-m was 0.78. Study participants needed approximately 5.4 min to complete the interview. Lower raw TICS-m scores were associated with male sex, older age and lower education (all p < 0.0001). After correction for education years, 2,851 (79%) had a non-impaired cognitive status (score >31). Male sex was independently associated with having a score equal to or below 27 and 31 (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5 and OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The TICS-m is a feasible questionnaire for community-dwelling older adults with normal cognitive function or moderate cognitive impairment. Lower cognitive performance was associated with being a man, being older, and having fewer years of formal education.
Authors: Kevin Duff; David Shprecher; Irene Litvan; Adam Gerstenecker; Benjamin Mast Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: C Galbete; E Toledo; J B Toledo; M Bes-Rastrollo; P Buil-Cosiales; A Marti; F Guillén-Grima; M A Martínez-González Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Carol L Hodgson; Andrew A Udy; Michael Bailey; Jonathan Barrett; Rinaldo Bellomo; Tracey Bucknall; Belinda J Gabbe; Alisa M Higgins; Theodore J Iwashyna; Julian Hunt-Smith; Lynne J Murray; Paul S Myles; Jennie Ponsford; David Pilcher; Craig Walker; Meredith Young; D J Cooper Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Michaela F George; Calliope B Holingue; Farren B S Briggs; Xiaorong Shao; Kalliope H Bellesis; Rachel A Whitmer; Catherine Schaefer; Ralph Hb Benedict; Lisa F Barcellos Journal: J Neurol Neuromedicine Date: 2016
Authors: Melissa J Armstrong; Henry L Paulson; Susan M Maixner; Julie A Fields; Angela M Lunde; Bradley F Boeve; Carol Manning; James E Galvin; Angela S Taylor; Zhigang Li Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Yeon Kyung Chi; Ji Won Han; Hyeon Jeong; Jae Young Park; Tae Hui Kim; Jung Jae Lee; Seok Bum Lee; Joon Hyuk Park; Jong Chul Yoon; Jeong Lan Kim; Seung-Ho Ryu; Jin Hyeong Jhoo; Dong Young Lee; Ki Woong Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 3.240