Literature DB >> 23242667

Comparative effectiveness of isolation techniques for contemporary Influenza A virus strains circulating in exhibition swine.

Andrew S Bowman1, Sarah W Nelson, Jody L Edwards, Christian C Hofer, Jacqueline M Nolting, Ian C Davis, Richard D Slemons.   

Abstract

The current study sought to compare the effectiveness of 2 virus isolation methods for the recovery of contemporary Influenza A virus (FLUAV) strains circulating in swine at agricultural exhibitions. Following the emergence of the influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 virus, increased surveillance of FLUAV strains among swine was recommended for early detection of emerging strains that threaten animal and human health. The increase in genetic drift and genomic reassortment among FLUAV strains infecting swine since 1998 necessitates that detection protocols be periodically validated for contemporary FLUAV strains. During 2009, nasal swabs were collected from 221 clinically healthy pigs at 12 agricultural exhibitions in Ohio. Nasal swabs were tested in parallel for the presence of FLUAV strains using 3 methodologies: 2 passages through Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells adapted to serum-free medium (SFM), 2 passages through embryonated chicken eggs (ECEs), and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR). Of the 221 samples, 40 (18.1%) were positive for FLUAV recovery in MDCK cell culture and 13 (5.9%) were positive in ECEs (P = 0.015). All samples positive in ECEs were also positive in MDCK cell culture. MDCK cell culture virus isolation results were in perfect agreement with results of the real-time RT-PCR. Hemagglutinin and neuraminidase combinations of the recovered isolates were H1N2 and H3N2, which were consistent with FLUAV strains circulating in U.S. pigs. Effectiveness and cost savings justify the use of SFM-adapted MDCK cell culture over ECEs for the recovery of contemporary FLUAV strains from exhibition swine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23242667     DOI: 10.1177/1040638712470449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  14 in total

1.  The Inability to Screen Exhibition Swine for Influenza A Virus Using Body Temperature.

Authors:  A S Bowman; J M Nolting; J D Workman; M Cooper; A E Fisher; B Marsh; T Forshey
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.702

2.  Ring test evaluation of the detection of influenza A virus in swine oral fluids by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and virus isolation.

Authors:  Christa K Goodell; Jianqiang Zhang; Erin Strait; Karen Harmon; Devi Patnayak; Tracy Otterson; Marie Culhane; Jane Christopher-Hennings; Travis Clement; Pamela Leslie-Steen; Richard Hesse; Joe Anderson; Kevin Skarbek; Amy Vincent; Pravina Kitikoon; Sabrina Swenson; Melinda Jenkins-Moore; Jodi McGill; Rolf Rauh; William Nelson; Catherine O'Connell; Rohan Shah; Chong Wang; Rodger Main; Jeffrey J Zimmerman
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Adoption of recommended hand hygiene practices to limit zoonotic disease transmission at agricultural fairs.

Authors:  Sarah E Lauterbach; Sarah W Nelson; Alison M Martin; Michele M Spurck; Dimitria A Mathys; Dixie F Mollenkopf; Jacqueline M Nolting; Thomas E Wittum; Andrew S Bowman
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.670

4.  A Heterogeneous Swine Show Circuit Drives Zoonotic Transmission of Influenza A Viruses in the United States.

Authors:  Martha I Nelson; Amanda Perofsky; Dillon S McBride; Benjamin L Rambo-Martin; Malania M Wilson; John R Barnes; Harm van Bakel; Zenab Khan; Jayeeta Dutta; Jacqueline M Nolting; Andrew S Bowman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Infection of mice with influenza A/WSN/33 (H1N1) virus alters alveolar type II cell phenotype.

Authors:  Christian C Hofer; Parker S Woods; Ian C Davis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 6.011

6.  Development of a real-time reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for the rapid detection of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus.

Authors:  Xuewu Yu; Lin Shi; Xiaoping Lv; Wei Yao; Minghui Cao; Hanxun Yu; Xiurong Wang; Shimin Zheng
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.099

7.  Exploration of risk factors contributing to the presence of influenza A virus in swine at agricultural fairs.

Authors:  Andrew S Bowman; Jeffrey D Workman; Jacqueline M Nolting; Sarah W Nelson; Richard D Slemons
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 7.163

8.  Swine-to-human transmission of influenza A(H3N2) virus at agricultural fairs, Ohio, USA, 2012.

Authors:  Andrew S Bowman; Sarah W Nelson; Shannon L Page; Jacqueline M Nolting; Mary L Killian; Srinand Sreevatsan; Richard D Slemons
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Utility of snout wipe samples for influenza A virus surveillance in exhibition swine populations.

Authors:  Jody L Edwards; Sarah W Nelson; Jeffrey D Workman; Richard D Slemons; Christine M Szablewski; Jacqueline M Nolting; Andrew S Bowman
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Influenza Vaccination of Swine Reduces Public Health Risk at the Swine-Human Interface.

Authors:  Joshua N Lorbach; Sarah W Nelson; Sarah E Lauterbach; Jacqueline M Nolting; Eben Kenah; Dillon S McBride; Marie R Culhane; Christa Goodell; Andrew S Bowman
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.