Literature DB >> 23242487

Instrument Failures for the da Vinci Surgical System: a Food and Drug Administration MAUDE Database Study.

Diana C W Friedman1, Thomas S Lendvay, Blake Hannaford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to analyze reported instances of the da Vinci robotic surgical system instrument failures using the FDA's MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience) database. From these data we identified some root causes of failures as well as trends that may assist surgeons and users of the robotic technology.
METHODS: We conducted a survey of the MAUDE database and tallied robotic instrument failures that occurred between January 2009 and December 2010. We categorized failures into five main groups (cautery, shaft, wrist or tool tip, cable, and control housing) based on technical differences in instrument design and function.
RESULTS: A total of 565 instrument failures were documented through 528 reports. The majority of failures (285) were of the instrument's wrist or tool tip. Cautery problems comprised 174 failures, 76 were shaft failures, 29 were cable failures, and 7 were control housing failures. Of the reports, 10 had no discernible failure mode and 49 exhibited multiple failures.
CONCLUSIONS: The data show that a number of robotic instrument failures occurred in a short period of time. In reality, many instrument failures may go unreported, thus a true failure rate cannot be determined from these data. However, education of hospital administrators, operating room staff, surgeons, and patients should be incorporated into discussions regarding the introduction and utilization of robotic technology. We recommend institutions incorporate standard failure reporting policies so that the community of robotic surgery companies and surgeons can improve on existing technologies for optimal patient safety and outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23242487     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2659-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

Review 1.  Device failures associated with patient injuries during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries: a comprehensive review of FDA MAUDE database.

Authors:  Sero Andonian; Zeph Okeke; Deidre A Okeke; Ardeshir Rastinehad; Brian A Vanderbrink; Lee Richstone; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 2.  Intraoperative breakage of needle driver jaw during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sung Yul Park; Kang Su Cho; Seung Wook Lee; Byung Hyun Soh; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Robotic equipment malfunction during robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Hugh J Lavery; Rahul Thaly; David Albala; Thomas Ahlering; Arieh Shalhav; David Lee; Randy Fagin; Peter Wiklund; Prokar Dasgupta; Anthony J Costello; Ashutosh Tewari; Geoff Coughlin; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Prospective study comparing standard and robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Peter Kornprat; Georg Werkgartner; Herwig Cerwenka; Heinz Bacher; Azab El-Shabrawi; Peter Rehak; Hans Jörg Mischinger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Annibale D'Annibale; Emilio Morpurgo; Valentino Fiscon; Paolo Trevisan; Gianna Sovernigo; Camillo Orsini; Daniela Guidolin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Initiation of a pediatric robotic surgery program: institutional challenges and realistic outcomes.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael H Johnson; Catherine Delostrinos; Jeff B Bice; Richard W Grady; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic instrument insulation failure: initial report of a potential source of patient injury.

Authors:  Adam C Mues; Geoffrey N Box; Ronney Abaza
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Failure and malfunction of da Vinci Surgical systems during various robotic surgeries: experience from six departments at a single institute.

Authors:  Won Tae Kim; Won Sik Ham; Wooju Jeong; Hyun Jung Song; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Critical appraisal of technical problems with robotic urological surgery.

Authors:  Rishi Nayyar; Narmada P Gupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  A unique instrumental malfunction during robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sung Yul Park; Jenny Jin-Kyung Ahn; Wooju Jeong; Won Sik Ham; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  7 in total

1.  Robotic sacrocolpopexy: adverse events reported to the FDA over the last decade.

Authors:  Colby Souders; Farnoosh Nik-Ahd; Hanson Zhao; Karyn Eilber; Bilal Chugtai; Jennifer Anger
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Occult risk of broken instruments for endoscopy-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yasuhara; Kazuhiko Fukatsu; Takami Komatsu; Satoshi Murakoshi; Yuhei Saito; Yushi Uetera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Adverse event reporting in head and neck transoral robotic surgery: a MAUDE database study.

Authors:  Jed H Assam; Max C DeHaan; Suzanne Bakken; William C Spanos
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-23

4.  Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data.

Authors:  Homa Alemzadeh; Jaishankar Raman; Nancy Leveson; Zbigniew Kalbarczyk; Ravishankar K Iyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Early experience with the ARTISENTIAL® articulated instruments in laparoscopic low anterior resection with TME.

Authors:  I Darwich; M Abuassi; R Aliyev; M Scheidt; M A Alkadri; A Hees; S Demirel-Darwich; M Chand; F Willeke
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 6.  Pediatric robotic urologic surgery-2014.

Authors:  James T Kearns; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-07

7.  Novel surgical techniques, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Maciej Nowacki; Łukasz Nazarewski; Tomasz Kloskowski; Dominik Tyloch; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Katarzyna Pietkun; Arkadiusz Jundziłł; Janusz Tyloch; Samy L Habib; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.318

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.