Literature DB >> 20846712

Robotic instrument insulation failure: initial report of a potential source of patient injury.

Adam C Mues1, Geoffrey N Box, Ronney Abaza.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with failures in the accessory tip covers that insulate the monopolar robotic cautery scissor instruments and the patient injuries that have resulted. Currently, there is no data in the literature regarding the failure rate of robotic instruments or their accessory components.
METHODS: All robotic surgeries performed at our institution were recorded from July 2008 to January 2009. Instrument tip cover failures were recorded at the time of failure regardless of whether a patient complication occurred. Failure was identified by the arching of the electrical current from the insulated portion of the monopolar scissors or by an intraoperative injury.
RESULTS: Four-hundred fifty-four robotic procedures were recorded. A total of 12 accessory tip cover failures were discovered, demonstrating a failure rate of 2.6%, with a patient complication rate of 0.6% (25% of all failures).
CONCLUSIONS: Failure in robotic accessory tip covers can lead to patient complications. The cause for failure can be attributed to a variety of electrical and mechanical causes. All centers and surgeons performing robotic surgery should be aware of the potential for this problem to occur, and the possible interventions that may reduce tip cover failure. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20846712     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Occult risk of broken instruments for endoscopy-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yasuhara; Kazuhiko Fukatsu; Takami Komatsu; Satoshi Murakoshi; Yuhei Saito; Yushi Uetera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Instrument Failures for the da Vinci Surgical System: a Food and Drug Administration MAUDE Database Study.

Authors:  Diana C W Friedman; Thomas S Lendvay; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data.

Authors:  Homa Alemzadeh; Jaishankar Raman; Nancy Leveson; Zbigniew Kalbarczyk; Ravishankar K Iyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Instrument malfunction during robotic surgery: A case report.

Authors:  Shivanshu Singh; Girdhar S Bora; Sudheer S Devana; Ravimohan S Mavuduru; Shrawan K Singh; Arup K Mandal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

5.  Malfunctions of robotic system in surgery: role and responsibility of surgeon in legal point of view.

Authors:  Alessia Ferrarese; Giada Pozzi; Felice Borghi; Alessandra Marano; Paola Delbon; Bruno Amato; Michele Santangelo; Claudio Buccelli; Massimo Niola; Valter Martino; Emanuele Capasso
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-08-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.