| Literature DB >> 23241885 |
Yoshiki Shiraishi1, Yi Jia, Joanne Domenico, Anthony Joetham, Hajime Karasuyama, Katsuyuki Takeda, Erwin W Gelfand.
Abstract
Histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R)-deficient mice (H(4)R(-/-)), H(4)R antagonist-treated wild-type (WT) mice, and WT mice depleted of basophils failed to develop early (EPR) or late phase (LPR) nasal responses following allergen sensitization and challenge. Basophil transfer from WT but not H(4)R(-/-) mice restored the EPR and LPR in H(4)R(-/-) mice. Following passive sensitization with OVA-specific IgE, FcεRI(-/-) recipients of WT basophils plus OVA and histamine developed an EPR and LPR. OVA-IgE passively sensitized FcεRI(-/-) recipients of H(4)R(-/-) basophils and OVA and histamine challenge failed to develop an EPR or LPR, and basophils were not detected in nasal tissue. In contrast, recipients of basophils from IL-13(-/-) and IL-4(-/-)/IL-13(-/-) mice developed an EPR but not an LPR. These results demonstrate the development of allergic rhinitis proceeded in two distinct stages: histamine release from FcεRI-activated mast cells, followed by histamine-mediated recruitment of H(4)R-expressing basophils to the nasal cavity and activation through FcεRI.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23241885 PMCID: PMC3538893 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol ISSN: 0022-1767 Impact factor: 5.422