Literature DB >> 23239668

Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter?

Michael J Salata1, Seth L Sherman, Emery C Lin, Robert A Sershon, Aman Gupta, Elizabeth Shewman, Vincent M Wang, Brian J Cole, Anthony A Romeo, Nikhil N Verma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suture anchor fixation has become the preferred method for arthroscopic repairs of rotator cuff tears. Recently, newer arthroscopic repair techniques including transosseous-equivalent repairs with anchors or arthroscopic transosseous suture passage have been developed.
PURPOSE: To compare the initial biomechanical performance including ultimate load to failure and localized cyclic elongation between transosseous-equivalent repair with anchors (TOE), traditional transosseous repair with a curved bone tunnel (TO), and an arthroscopic transosseous repair technique utilizing a simple (AT) or X-box suture configuration (ATX). STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Twenty-eight human cadaveric shoulders were dissected to create an isolated supraspinatus tear and randomized into 1 of 4 repair groups (TOE, TO, AT, ATX). Tensile testing was conducted to simulate the anatomic position of the supraspinatus with the arm in 60° of abduction and involved an initial preload, cyclic loading, and pull to failure. Localized elongation during testing was measured using optical tracking. Data were statistically assessed using analysis of variance with a Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: The TOE repair demonstrated a significantly higher mean ± SD failure load (558.4 ± 122.9 N) compared with the TO (325.3 ± 79.9 N), AT (291.7 ± 57.9 N), and ATX (388.5 ± 92.6 N) repairs (P < .05). There was also a significantly larger amount of first-cycle excursion in the AT group (8.19 ± 1.85 mm) compared with the TOE group (5.10 ± 0.89 mm). There was no significant difference between repair groups in stiffness during maximum load to failure or in normalized cyclic elongation. Failure modes were as follows: TOE, tendon (n = 4) and bone (n = 3); TO, suture (n = 6) and bone (n = 1); AT, tendon (n = 2) and bone (n = 3) and suture (n = 1); ATX, tendon (n = 7).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that anchorless repair techniques using transosseous sutures result in significantly lower failure loads than a repair model utilizing anchors in a TOE construct. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suture anchor repair appears to offer superior biomechanical properties to transosseous repairs regardless of tunnel or suture configuration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23239668     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512469092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Patch augmentation of the rotator cuff. A reasonable choice or a waste of money?].

Authors:  M Flury
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Hybrid Repair of Large Crescent Rotator Cuff Tears Using a Modified SpeedBridge and Double-Pulley Technique.

Authors:  Aakash Chauhan; Steven Regal; Darren A Frank
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-06-23

3.  Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques.

Authors:  Ahmet Fırat; Mustafa Aydın; Osman Tecimel; Ali Öçgüder; Yavuz Sanisoğlu; Mahmut Uğurlu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Suture anchor repair yields better biomechanical properties than transosseous sutures in ruptured quadriceps tendons.

Authors:  M Petri; A Dratzidis; S Brand; T Calliess; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski; M Ettinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anchorless Arthroscopic Transosseous and Anchored Arthroscopic Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair Show No Differences in Structural Integrity or Patient-reported Outcomes in a Matched Cohort.

Authors:  Uma Srikumaran; Eric G Huish; Brendan Y Shi; Casey V Hannan; Iman Ali; Kelly G Kilcoyne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Brody A Flanagin; Raffaele Garofalo; Eddie Y Lo; LeeAnne Feher; Alessandro Castagna; Huanying Qin; Sumant G Krishnan
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  Does Medial-Row Fixation Technique Affect the Retear Rate and Functional Outcomes After Double-Row Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair?

Authors:  Ameer M Elbuluk; Francesca R Coxe; Peter D Fabricant; Nicholas L Ramos; Michael J Alaia; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-16

8.  Is Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair Strength Dependent on the Tunnel Angle?

Authors:  Daniel Bronsnick; Andrew Pastor; Dmitriy Peresada; Farid Amirouche; Giovanni Francesco Solitro; Benjamin A Goldberg
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-06

9.  Supraspinatus tendon transosseous vs anchor repair surgery: a comparative study of mechanical recovery in the rabbit.

Authors:  Joaquim Chaler; Hakim Louati; Hans K Uhthoff; Guy Trudel
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Load to Failure and Stiffness: Anchor Placement and Suture Pattern Effects on Load to Failure in Rotator Cuff Repairs.

Authors:  Amanda O Esquivel; Douglas D Duncan; Nikola Dobrasevic; Stephanie M Marsh; Stephen E Lemos
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.