PURPOSE: Large electronic datasets are increasingly being used to evaluate healthcare delivery. The aim of this study was to compare information held by cancer registries with that of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). METHODS: A convenience sample of 101 020 patients aged 40+ years drawn from GPRD formed the primary data source. This cohort was derived from a larger sample originally established for a cohort study of diabetes. GPRD records were linked with those from cancer registries in the National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR). Concordance between the two datasets was then evaluated. For cases recorded only on one dataset, validation was sought from other datasets (Hospital Episode Statistics and death registration) and by detailed analysis of a subset of GPRD records. RESULTS: A total of 5797 cancers (excluding non-melanomatous skin cancer) were recorded on GPRD. Of these cases, 4830 were also recorded on NCDR (concordance rate of 83.3%). Of the 976 cases recorded on GPRD but not on NCDR, 528 were present also in the hospital records or death certificates. Of the 341 cases recorded on NCDR but not on GPRD, 307 were recorded in these other two datasets. Rates of concordance varied by cancer type. Cancer registries recorded larger numbers of patients with lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers, whereas GPRD recorded more haematological cancers and melanomas. As expected, GPRD recorded significantly more non-melanomatous skin cancer. Concordance decreased with increasing age. CONCLUSION: Although concordance levels were reasonably high, the findings from this study can be used to direct efforts for better recording in both datasets.
PURPOSE: Large electronic datasets are increasingly being used to evaluate healthcare delivery. The aim of this study was to compare information held by cancer registries with that of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). METHODS: A convenience sample of 101 020 patients aged 40+ years drawn from GPRD formed the primary data source. This cohort was derived from a larger sample originally established for a cohort study of diabetes. GPRD records were linked with those from cancer registries in the National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR). Concordance between the two datasets was then evaluated. For cases recorded only on one dataset, validation was sought from other datasets (Hospital Episode Statistics and death registration) and by detailed analysis of a subset of GPRD records. RESULTS: A total of 5797 cancers (excluding non-melanomatous skin cancer) were recorded on GPRD. Of these cases, 4830 were also recorded on NCDR (concordance rate of 83.3%). Of the 976 cases recorded on GPRD but not on NCDR, 528 were present also in the hospital records or death certificates. Of the 341 cases recorded on NCDR but not on GPRD, 307 were recorded in these other two datasets. Rates of concordance varied by cancer type. Cancer registries recorded larger numbers of patients with lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers, whereas GPRD recorded more haematological cancers and melanomas. As expected, GPRD recorded significantly more non-melanomatous skin cancer. Concordance decreased with increasing age. CONCLUSION: Although concordance levels were reasonably high, the findings from this study can be used to direct efforts for better recording in both datasets.
Authors: Zhiwei Liu; Rotana Alsaggaf; Katherine A McGlynn; Lesley A Anderson; Huei-Ting Tsai; Bin Zhu; Yue Zhu; Sam M Mbulaiteye; Shahinaz M Gadalla; Jill Koshiol Journal: Gut Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Brian D Nicholson; William Hamilton; Jack O'Sullivan; Paul Aveyard; Fd Richard Hobbs Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Chris R Cardwell; Úna C Mc Menamin; Blánaid M Hicks; Carmel Hughes; Marie M Cantwell; Liam J Murray Journal: BMC Med Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 8.775