Literature DB >> 23238490

Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.

Jeffrey Lange1, Andrew Karellas, John Street, Jason C Eck, Anthony Lapinsky, Patrick J Connolly, Christian P Dipaola.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Observational.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the radiation dose imparted to patients during typical thoracolumbar spinal surgical scenarios. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive techniques continue to become more common in spine surgery. Computer-assisted navigation systems coupled with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CT) represent one such method used to aid in instrumented spinal procedures. Some studies indicate that cone-beam CT technology delivers a relatively low dose of radiation to patients compared with other x-ray-based imaging modalities. The goal of this study was to estimate the radiation exposure to the patient imparted during typical posterior thoracolumbar instrumented spinal procedures, using intraoperative cone-beam CT and to place these values in the context of standard CT doses.
METHODS: Cone-beam CT scans were obtained using Medtronic O-arm (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). Thermoluminescence dosimeters were placed in a linear array on a foam-plastic thoracolumbar spine model centered above the radiation source for O-arm presets of lumbar scans for small or large patients. In-air dosimeter measurements were converted to skin surface measurements, using published conversion factors. Dose-length product was calculated from these values. Effective dose was estimated using published effective dose to dose-length product conversion factors.
RESULTS: Calculated dosages for many full-length procedures using the small-patient setting fell within the range of published effective doses of abdominal CT scans (1-31 mSv). Calculated dosages for many full-length procedures using the large-patient setting fell within the range of published effective doses of abdominal CT scans when the number of scans did not exceed 3.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that single cone-beam CT scans and most full-length posterior instrumented spinal procedures using O-arm in standard mode would likely impart a radiation dose within the range of those imparted by a single standard CT scan of the abdomen. Radiation dose increases with patient size, and the radiation dose received by larger patients as a result of more than 3 O-arm scans in standard mode may exceed the dose received during standard CT of the abdomen. Understanding radiation imparted to patients by cone-beam CT is important for assessing risks and benefits of this technology, especially when spinal surgical procedures require multiple intraoperative scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23238490     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318281d70b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Radiation exposure to the patients in thoracic and lumbar spine fusion using a new intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography imaging technique: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ludovic Kaminski; V Cordemans; O Cartiaux; M Van Cauter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pedicle screw insertion with patient-specific 3D-printed guides based on low-dose CT scan is more accurate than free-hand technique in spine deformity patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Riccardo Cecchinato; Pedro Berjano; Alberto Zerbi; Marco Damilano; Andrea Redaelli; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Does less invasive spine surgery result in increased radiation exposure? A systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yu; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Radiation exposure using the O-arm® surgical imaging system.

Authors:  Nicolas Pitteloud; Axel Gamulin; Christophe Barea; Jerome Damet; Guillaume Racloz; Marta Sans-Merce
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Segmental Surface Referencing during Intraoperative Three-dimensional Image-Guided Spine Navigation: An Early Validation with Comparison to Automated Referencing.

Authors:  Amro F Al-Habib; Salah Al-Akkad
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2016-04-20

Review 6.  Radiation exposure and reduction in the operating room: Perspectives and future directions in spine surgery.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Kelly H Yom; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Brittany E Haws; Kern Singh
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-07-18

7.  Significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective study.

Authors:  Guoxin Fan; Hailong Zhang; Xin Gu; Chuanfeng Wang; Xiaofei Guan; Yunshan Fan; Shisheng He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Evolving Navigation, Robotics, and Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hussain; Murat Cosar; Sertac Kirnaz; Franziska A Schmidt; Christoph Wipplinger; Taylor Wong; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

9.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Scoliosis Surgery: A Comparison between Conventional Computed Tomography-Based and O-Arm-Based Navigation Techniques.

Authors:  Toshiaki Kotani; Tsutomu Akazawa; Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Kayo Koyama; Tetsuharu Nemoto; Kento Nawata; Atsuro Yamazaki; Shohei Minami
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-06-09

10.  Total 3D Airo® Navigation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Lian; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Connor Berlin; Ajit Jada; Yu Moriguchi; Qiwei Zhang; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.