| Literature DB >> 23238211 |
Emma H Allott1, Melissa J Morine, Joanne Lysaght, Sarah A McGarrigle, Claire L Donohoe, John V Reynolds, Helen M Roche, Graham P Pidgeon.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Obesity is linked to increased mortality from many cancer types, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) displays one of the strongest epidemiological associations. The aims of this study are to dissect molecular pathways linking obesity with EAC and to determine if obesity is linked to increased aggressiveness of this disease.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23238211 PMCID: PMC3365676 DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2012.5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol ISSN: 2155-384X Impact factor: 4.488
Patient demographics
| No. of patients | 6 | 12 | 39 |
| Sex (male), | 6 (100) | 10 (83.3) | 39 (100) |
| Age at surgery, mean (range) | 58.2 (49–63) | 60.2 (55–69) | 64 (48–81) |
| Diagnosis | EAC | EAC | EAC |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (range) | 30.3 (25.4–39) | 30 (22–39) | 26 (19–39) |
| WC (cm), mean (range) | 107.3 (98–130) | 103.8 (81–130) | 95.5 (77–130) |
| VFA (cm2), mean (range) | 209.9 (120.9–297.6) | 206 (42.5–383.8) | 154 (13–384) |
| Metabolic syndrome, | 2 (33.3) | 7 (58.3) | 13 (33.3) |
| Neoadjuvant therapy, | 3 (50) | 6 (50) | 16 (41) |
BMI, body mass index; VFA, visceral fat area; WC, waist circumference.
Figure 1Clustering heatmap analysis of genes differentially expressed in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cells following coculture with whole adipose tissue, adipocytes, or control medium in the highest 5% of variance identified by Affymetrix microarray analysis. Numbers represent patient number, w=OE33 following coculture with whole adipose tissue, a=OE33 following coculture with adipocytes, and c=OE33 following coculture with control M199 medium.
Top differentially expressed genes (ranked by logFC) in top three significantly upregulated pathways in esophageal adenocarcinoma OE33 following coculture with adipose tissue from viscerally obese EAC patients
| Cytokine signaling* | 6.941 | ||
| 4.370 | |||
| 1.871 | |||
| 1.580 | |||
| 1.501 | |||
| 1.082 | |||
| 0.873 | |||
| 0.840 | |||
| 0.424 | |||
| 0.351 | |||
| Focal adhesion/EMT* | 4.919 | ||
| 2.867 | |||
| 2.496 | |||
| 1.353 | |||
| 1.255 | |||
| 1.149 | |||
| 0.656 | |||
| 0.504 | |||
| 0.410 | |||
| 0.269 | |||
| Glycolysis* | 1.555 | ||
| 1.406 | |||
| 1.110 | |||
| 1.071 | |||
| 1.036 | |||
| 0.716 | |||
| 0.697 | |||
| 0.589 | |||
| 0.350 |
EMT, epithelial mesenchymal transition.
Genes differentially expressed between OE33 following coculture with adipose tissue or control M199 medium (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.0001).
Figure 2Coculture of esophageal adenocarcinoma OE33 with visceral adipose tissue induces expression of genes involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition, PAI-1 and SNAI2. Statistical analysis was performed using paired Student's t-test (**P<0.01, ***P<0.001 between control and whole adipose tissue treatment groups).
PAI-1, SNAI2, and E-cadherin expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with respect to obesity status and tumor differentiation
| 0.009 | 0.0693 | 0.2218 | ||||
| Non-obese <30 | 1.014 (0.299) | 25.623 (3.549) | 4.546 (0.847) | |||
| Obese ≥30 | 3.691 (1.195) | 61.411 (24.515) | 3.01 (0.656) | |||
| 0.0397 | 0.3097 | 0.0447 | ||||
| Non-obese < 94 cm | 0.74 (0.164) | 26.659 (4.976) | 5.423 (1.232) | |||
| Obese ≥94 cm | 2.833 (0.808) | 46.731 (2.533) | 2.999 (0.468) | |||
| 0.031 | 0.2437 | 0.0602 | ||||
| Non-obese <130 cm2 | 0.529 (0.149) | 23.839 (4.134) | 5.49 (1.415) | |||
| Obese ≥130 cm2 | 2.775 (0.74) | 46.655 (14.145) | 3.155 (0.442) | |||
| 0.2782 | 0.2809 | 0.5852 | ||||
| Well/moderate | 1.517 (0.492) | 73.584 (26.049) | 4.413 (0.639) | |||
| Poor | 2.467 (0.727) | 43.901 (9.297) | 3.817 (0.865) | |||
| 0.1632 | 0.1796 | 0.4062 | ||||
| T0–T1 | 1.569 (0.671) | 95.248 (49.316) | 3.158 (0.803) | |||
| T2–T3 | 2.634 (0.748) | 48.598 (12.171) | 4.301 (0.656) | |||
| 0.5241 | 0.7256 | 0.2184 | ||||
| N0 | 1.569 (0.671) | 64.717 (28.545) | 3.168 (0.569) | |||
| N1 | 2.166 (0.557) | 54.382 (15.01) | 4.581 (0.792) | |||
| 0.3262 | 0.5117 | 0.6864 | ||||
| Yes | 2.26 (0.606) | 55.127 (15.53) | 3.90 (0.581) | |||
| No | 1.504 (0.561) | 77.695 (37.67) | 4.45 (1.566) | |||
| 0.4164 | 0.4169 | 0.8639 | ||||
| Yes | 2.299 (0.606) | 48.616 (15.974) | 3.963 (0.569) | |||
| No | 1.504 (0.561) | 72.395 (26.047) | 4.161 (1.103) | |||
| 0.6496 | 0.4895 | 0.3857 | ||||
| Yes | 2.338 (0.985) | 44.257 (13.09) | 4.195 (0.949) | |||
| No | 1.9 (0.466) | 66.371 (20.284) | 3.403 (0.433) | |||
BMI, body mass index; lymph inv., lymph involvement; perineural inv., perineural involvement, expression relative to a calibrator sample (non-obese patient); pN, pathological node stage; pT, pathological tumor stage; tumor diff., tumor differentiation status; venous inv., venous involvement; VFA, visceral fat area; WC, waist circumference.
Figure 3Elevated tumor gene expression of SNAI2 is associated with poor patient prognosis. Gene expression was separated into above (n=22) and below (n=23) the median expression value, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test (*P<0.05).