Literature DB >> 17122988

Molecular prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

S M Lagarde1, F J W ten Kate, D J Richel, G J A Offerhaus, J J B van Lanschot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This review describes genetic and molecular changes related to adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) with emphasis on prognostic value and possibilities for targeted therapy in clinical setting. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or GEJ is an aggressive disease with early lymphatic and hematogenous dissemination. Molecular pathology has revealed many molecular mechanisms of disease progression, which are related to prognosis. Some of these factors can be seen as prognostic factors per se. Better knowledge of molecular bases may lead to new paradigms, improved prognostication, early diagnosis and individually tailored therapeutic options.
METHODS: A review of recent English literature (1990-October 2005) concerning esophageal adenocarcinoma was performed. This review focuses on genetic and molecular changes as prognosticators of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ.
RESULTS: A bewildering number of biomarkers have been described. Many genes and molecules have prognostic impact (cyclin D1, EGFR, Her-2/Neu, APC, TGF-beta, Endoglin, CTGF, P53, Bcl-2, NF-kappaB, Cox-2, E-cadherin, beta-catenin, uPA, MMP-1,3,7,9, TIMP, T( h )1/T( h )2 balance, CRP, PTHrP).
CONCLUSIONS: Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and GEJ show multiple genetic alterations, which indicate that progression of cancer is a multistep complex process with many different alterations. Presumably, it is not one molecular factor that can predict the biological behavior of this cancer. The combination of diverse genetic alterations may better predict prognosis. In future, gene expression analysis with microarrays may reveal important prognostic information and the discovery of new genes and molecules associated with tumor progression and dissemination will enhance prognostication and offers adjuvant therapeutic options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17122988     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9262-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  21 in total

Review 1.  Role of chemoprophylaxis with either NSAIDs or statins in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Panagiotis Tsibouris; Erasmia Vlachou; Peter Edward Thomas Isaacs
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-06

2.  Molecular Marker Expression Is Highly Heterogeneous in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Does Not Predict a Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Nathan W Bronson; Brian S Diggs; Gene Bakis; Kenneth M Gatter; Brett C Sheppard; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Whole-miRNome profiling identifies prognostic serum miRNAs in esophageal adenocarcinoma: the influence of Helicobacter pylori infection status.

Authors:  Rihong Zhai; Yongyue Wei; Li Su; Geoffrey Liu; Mathew H Kulke; John C Wain; David C Christiani
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Parathyroid Hormone-Related Peptide-Linked Hypercalcemia in a Melanoma Patient Treated With Ipilimumab: Hormone Source and Clinical and Metabolic Correlates.

Authors:  Teresa Anne Mills; Marlana Orloff; Marina Domingo-Vidal; Paolo Cotzia; Ruth C Birbe; Rossitza Draganova-Tacheva; Maria P Martinez Cantarin; Madalina Tuluc; Ubaldo Martinez-Outschoorn
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  A functional epidermal growth factor (EGF) polymorphism, EGF serum levels, and esophageal adenocarcinoma risk and outcome.

Authors:  Michael Lanuti; Geoffrey Liu; Jonathan M Goodwin; Rihong Zhai; Bryan C Fuchs; Kofi Asomaning; Li Su; Norman S Nishioka; Kenneth K Tanabe; David C Christiani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Correlations between selected tumor markers and fluorodeoxyglucose maximal standardized uptake values in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Taylor; Philip W Smith; William K Brix; Mark R Wick; Nicholas Theodosakis; Brian R Swenson; Benjamin D Kozower; David R Jones
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Disintegrin and metalloproteinases (ADAMs) expression in gastroesophageal reflux disease and in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T Kauttu; H Mustonen; S Vainionpää; L Krogerus; I Ilonen; J Räsänen; J Salo; P Puolakkainen
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Three-gene immunohistochemical panel adds to clinical staging algorithms to predict prognosis for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chin-Ann J Ong; Joel Shapiro; Katie S Nason; Jon M Davison; Xinxue Liu; Caryn Ross-Innes; Maria O'Donovan; Winand N M Dinjens; Katharina Biermann; Nicholas Shannon; Susannah Worster; Laura K E Schulz; James D Luketich; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Richard H Hardwick; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  ErbB receptors in the biology and pathology of the aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  Sarah Morgan; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  The antiproliferative effect of EPA in HL60 cells is mediated by alterations in calcium homeostasis.

Authors:  Jens Erik Slagsvold; Caroline Hild Hakvåg Pettersen; Turid Follestad; Hans Einar Krokan; Svanhild Arentz Schønberg
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 1.880

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.