Literature DB >> 23236973

Free-breathing 3 T magnetic resonance T2-mapping of the heart.

Ruud B van Heeswijk1, Hélène Feliciano, Cédric Bongard, Gabriele Bonanno, Simone Coppo, Nathalie Lauriers, Didier Locca, Juerg Schwitter, Matthias Stuber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to establish an accurate and reproducible T(2)-mapping cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) methodology at 3 T and to evaluate it in healthy volunteers and patients with myocardial infarct.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial edema affects the T(2) relaxation time on CMR. Therefore, T(2)-mapping has been established to characterize edema at 1.5 T. A 3 T implementation designed for longitudinal studies and aimed at guiding and monitoring therapy remains to be implemented, thoroughly characterized, and evaluated in vivo.
METHODS: A free-breathing navigator-gated radial CMR pulse sequence with an adiabatic T(2) preparation module and an empirical fitting equation for T(2) quantification was optimized using numerical simulations and was validated at 3 T in a phantom study. Its reproducibility for myocardial T(2) quantification was then ascertained in healthy volunteers and improved using an external reference phantom with known T(2). In a small cohort of patients with established myocardial infarction, the local T(2) value and extent of the edematous region were determined and compared with conventional T(2)-weighted CMR and x-ray coronary angiography, where available.
RESULTS: The numerical simulations and phantom study demonstrated that the empirical fitting equation is significantly more accurate for T(2) quantification than that for the more conventional exponential decay. The volunteer study consistently demonstrated a reproducibility error as low as 2 ± 1% using the external reference phantom and an average myocardial T(2) of 38.5 ± 4.5 ms. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the volunteers were -0.04 ± 0.89 ms (p = 0.86) and -0.23 ± 0.91 ms (p = 0.87), respectively. In the infarction patients, the T(2) in edema was 62.4 ± 9.2 ms and was consistent with the x-ray angiographic findings. Simultaneously, the extent of the edematous region by T(2)-mapping correlated well with that from the T(2)-weighted images (r = 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: The new, well-characterized 3 T methodology enables robust and accurate cardiac T(2)-mapping at 3 T with high spatial resolution, while the addition of a reference phantom improves reproducibility. This technique may be well suited for longitudinal studies in patients with suspected or established heart disease.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23236973     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  36 in total

1.  Postmortem MR quantification of the heart for characterization and differentiation of ischaemic myocardial lesions.

Authors:  Wolf-Dieter Zech; Nicole Schwendener; Anders Persson; Marcel J Warntjes; Christian Jackowski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Free-breathing slice-interleaved myocardial T2 mapping with slice-selective T2 magnetization preparation.

Authors:  Tamer A Basha; Steven Bellm; Sébastien Roujol; Shingo Kato; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Free-breathing, motion-corrected, highly efficient whole heart T2 mapping at 3T with hybrid radial-cartesian trajectory.

Authors:  Hsin-Jung Yang; Behzad Sharif; Jianing Pang; Avinash Kali; Xiaoming Bi; Ivan Cokic; Debiao Li; Rohan Dharmakumar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  T2 Relaxation Times at Cardiac MRI in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Christopher A Hanson; Akshay Kamath; Matthew Gottbrecht; Sami Ibrahim; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Technical Overview and Initial Results.

Authors:  Yuchi Liu; Jesse Hamilton; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-12

Review 6.  Clinical application and technical considerations of T1 & T2(*) mapping in cardiac, liver, and renal imaging.

Authors:  Ilona A Dekkers; Hildo J Lamb
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Improved respiratory self-navigation for 3D radial acquisitions through the use of a pencil-beam 2D-T2 -prep for free-breathing, whole-heart coronary MRA.

Authors:  Andrew J Coristine; Jerome Chaptinel; Giulia Ginami; Gabriele Bonanno; Simone Coppo; Ruud B van Heeswijk; Davide Piccini; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Joint myocardial T1 and T2 mapping using a combination of saturation recovery and T2 -preparation.

Authors:  Mehmet Akçakaya; Sebastian Weingärtner; Tamer A Basha; Sébastien Roujol; Steven Bellm; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Improved quantitative myocardial T2 mapping: Impact of the fitting model.

Authors:  Mehmet Akçakaya; Tamer A Basha; Sebastian Weingärtner; Sébastien Roujol; Sophie Berg; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Quantitative T2 mapping for detecting myocardial edema after reperfusion of myocardial infarction: validation and comparison with T2-weighted images.

Authors:  Chul Hwan Park; Eui-Young Choi; Hyuck Moon Kwon; Bum Kee Hong; Byoung Kwon Lee; Young Won Yoon; Pil-Ki Min; Andreas Greiser; Mun Young Paek; Wei Yu; Yon Mi Sung; Sung Ho Hwang; Yoo Jin Hong; Tae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.