| Literature DB >> 23236261 |
Jia-Zuo Shen1, Jian-Fei Yao, Da-Sheng Lin, Ke-Jian Lian, Zhen-Qi Ding, Bin Lin, Zhi-Min Guo, Ming-Hua Zhang, Qiang Li, Lin Li, Peng Qi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delayed bone union, nonunion or osteonecrosis often occur after femoral neck fractures in young adults. Secondary bone healing requires strong internal fixation, intramedullary pressure reduction and early functional exercise.Entities:
Keywords: Animal Research; Bone Graft; Dynamic Hip Screw; Femoral Neck Fracture; Hollow Screw; Pig; Young Adult.
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23236261 PMCID: PMC3520017 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.4567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Lane-Sandhu Score.
| Score | Callus Formation and Fracture Line |
|---|---|
| 0 | no callus formation and clear fracture line |
| 1 | 25% callus formation and relatively clear fracture line |
| 2 | 50% callus formation and obscure fracture line |
| 3 | 75% callus formation and almost invisible fracture line |
| 4 | 100% callus formation and invisible fracture line |
Because there is no callus formation in secondary bone healing of femoral neck fractures, we used the visibility of the fracture line to evaluate differences in bone healing.
Figure 3A,B,C showed the X-ray photographs at week 8 postoperatively; D,E,F showed the X-ray photographs at week 16 postoperatively.
Figure 4A,B,C,D showed the CT scan photographs at week 8 postoperatively; E,F,G,H showed the CT scan photographs at week 16 postoperatively.
Figure 5A showed the general specimens at week 8, kermesinus in Hb-DHS group(right), pale in DHS group(left); B showed transection of femoral neck and could see the flabellum-like-hole of Hb-DHS and plenty of trabecular bone formation at week 8; C showed the general specimens at week 16, pink in Hb-DHS group(right), kermesinus in DHS group(left); D showed transection of femoral neck and could see the flabellum-like-hole of Hb-DHS and a mass of trabecular bone formation at week 16.
Results of Lane-Sandhu Score in Hb-DHS Group and DHS Group.
| Weeks | Parameters | Hb-DHS Group | DHS Group | Z | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 weeks | M/S | 6.50/26.00 | 2.50/10.00 | -2.530 | <0.05 |
| 16 weeks | M/S | 6.38/25.50 | 2.62/10.50 | -2.247 | <0.05 |
Defined P<0.05 to be statistically significant difference; M/S demonstrated Mean Rank/ Sum of Ranks; Z demonstrated Z test; P demonstrated exact.sig.
Results of Vp and BMD in Hb-DHS Group and DHS Group.
| Weeks | Parameters | Hb-DHS Group | DHS Group | Z | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 weeks | Vp | 6.50/26.00 | 2.50/10.00 | -2.337 | <0.05 | |
| BMD(M/S) | Tension Side | 6.50/26.00 | 2.50/10.00 | -2.291 | <0.05 | |
| Pressure Side | 6.50/26.00 | 2.50/10.00 | -2.309 | <0.05 | ||
| 16 weeks | Vp | 6.50/26.00 | 2.50/10.00 | -2.336 | <0.05 | |
| BMD(M/S) | Tension Side | 6.50/26.00 | 2.50/10.00 | -2.247 | <0.05 | |
| Pressure Side | 6.50/26.00 | 2.50/10.00 | -2.309 | <0.05 | ||
Defined P<0.05 to be statistically significant difference; Vp demonstrated trabecular bone volume percentage; BMD demonstrated bone mineral density; M/S demonstrated Mean Rank/ Sum of Ranks; Z demonstrated Z test; P demonstrated exact.sig.