Literature DB >> 17414163

Femoral neck fractures: can physiologic status determine treatment choice?

Martin J Heetveld1, Ernst L F B Raaymakers, Jan S K Luitse, Marc Nijhof, Dirk J Gouma.   

Abstract

In patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, meta-analysis data show revision rates of 35% after internal fixation and 16% after hemiarthroplasty. A published physiologic status score management protocol, which selects for either treatment, suggests lower revision rates can be achieved but it has not been confirmed. The physiologic status score included subscores for mobility, accommodation, bone density, cognition, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class. We asked whether treatment selection with the physiologic status score could indeed reduce revision rates compared with meta-analysis data and whether surgical technique influenced results. In a prospective multicenter 2-year followup trial we enrolled 115 patients selected for internal fixation and 109 for hemiarthroplasty, aged 60 to 90 years. Healthier mobile patients underwent internal fixation and patients with a lower physiologic status score had hemiarthroplasty. The 2-year revision rate was 40% after internal fixation (above meta-analysis rate) and 3% after hemiarthroplasty (below meta-analysis rate). After a panel identified and excluded 15 technical failure cases, patients younger than 80 years with a high physiologic status score had a one in four revision rate of internal fixation, whereas older patients had a one in two revision rate. Although the revision rate was indeed low after hemiarthroplasty, treatment choice based on physiologic status does not substantially improve clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17414163     DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180574aca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

1.  Which is the best alternative for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly?: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongwei Gao; Zhonghao Liu; Deguo Xing; Mingzhi Gong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Adherence to a femoral neck fracture treatment guideline.

Authors:  Stephanie M Zielinski; Max A Meeuwis; Martin J Heetveld; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Gert R Roukema; Peter Patka; Esther M M Van Lieshout
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Hollow-bone-graft dynamic hip screw can fix and promote bone union after femoral neck fracture: an experimental research.

Authors:  Jia-Zuo Shen; Jian-Fei Yao; Da-Sheng Lin; Ke-Jian Lian; Zhen-Qi Ding; Bin Lin; Zhi-Min Guo; Ming-Hua Zhang; Qiang Li; Lin Li; Peng Qi
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Comparison of arthroplasty vs. osteosynthesis for displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng-Jen Tseng; Wei-Tso Chia; Ru-Yu Pan; Leou-Chyr Lin; Hsian-Chung Shen; Chih-Hung Wang; Jia-Fwu Shyu; Ching-Feng Weng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Low bone density and high morbidity in patients between 55 and 70 years with displaced femoral neck fractures: a case-control study of 50 patients vs 150 normal controls.

Authors:  Stefan Bartels; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Frede Frihagen; Cecilia Rogmark; Stein Erik Utvåg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Junhao Deng; Guoqi Wang; Jia Li; Song Wang; Miao Li; Xiaohong Yin; Licheng Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2020-12-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.