UNLABELLED: PET imaging has become a useful diagnostic tool in patients with anal cancer. We evaluated the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in patients with anal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Patients with anal cancer who underwent PET imaging for pretreatment staging or radiation therapy planning from 2003 to 2011 were included. PET parameters included MTV and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Total MTV (MTV-T) was defined as the sum of the volumes above a standardized uptake value 50% of the SUVmax within the primary tumor and involved nodes. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to test for associations between metabolic or clinical endpoints and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included. Median follow-up for the cohort was 22 mo. Overall, 6 patients died and 9 patients had disease progression. The 2-y OS, PFS, and EFS for the entire cohort were 88%, 74%, and 69%, respectively. Higher MTV-T was associated with worse OS (P = 0.04), PFS (P = 0.004), and EFS (P = 0.002) on univariate analysis. Patients with an MTV greater than 26 cm(3) had worse PFS than did those with an MTV of 26 cm(3) or less (33% vs. 82%, P = 0.003). SUVmax was not prognostic for any outcome. Higher T classification (T3/T4 vs. T1/T2) was associated with worse PFS and EFS. When adjusting for T classification, MTV-T remained a significant predictor for PFS (P = 0.01) and EFS (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: MTV-T yields prognostic information on PFS and EFS beyond that of established prognostic factors in patients with anal cancer.
UNLABELLED: PET imaging has become a useful diagnostic tool in patients with anal cancer. We evaluated the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in patients with anal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. METHODS:Patients with anal cancer who underwent PET imaging for pretreatment staging or radiation therapy planning from 2003 to 2011 were included. PET parameters included MTV and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Total MTV (MTV-T) was defined as the sum of the volumes above a standardized uptake value 50% of the SUVmax within the primary tumor and involved nodes. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to test for associations between metabolic or clinical endpoints and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included. Median follow-up for the cohort was 22 mo. Overall, 6 patients died and 9 patients had disease progression. The 2-y OS, PFS, and EFS for the entire cohort were 88%, 74%, and 69%, respectively. Higher MTV-T was associated with worse OS (P = 0.04), PFS (P = 0.004), and EFS (P = 0.002) on univariate analysis. Patients with an MTV greater than 26 cm(3) had worse PFS than did those with an MTV of 26 cm(3) or less (33% vs. 82%, P = 0.003). SUVmax was not prognostic for any outcome. Higher T classification (T3/T4 vs. T1/T2) was associated with worse PFS and EFS. When adjusting for T classification, MTV-T remained a significant predictor for PFS (P = 0.01) and EFS (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION:MTV-T yields prognostic information on PFS and EFS beyond that of established prognostic factors in patients with anal cancer.
Authors: Avani S Dholakia; Muhammad Chaudhry; Jeffrey P Leal; Daniel T Chang; Siva P Raman; Amy Hacker-Prietz; Zheng Su; Jonathan Pai; Katharine E Oteiza; Mary E Griffith; Richard L Wahl; Erik Tryggestad; Timothy Pawlik; Daniel A Laheru; Christopher L Wolfgang; Albert C Koong; Joseph M Herman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Shih-ying Huang; Wesley E Bolch; Choonsik Lee; Henry F Van Brocklin; Miguel H Pampaloni; Randall A Hawkins; Aimee Sznewajs; Steven G DuBois; Katherine K Matthay; Youngho Seo Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Marcelo A Queiroz; Cinthia D Ortega; Felipe R Ferreira; Fernanda C Capareli; Sergio C Nahas; Giovanni G Cerri; Carlos A Buchpiguel Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Vasavi Paidpally; Alin Chirindel; Christine H Chung; Jeremy Richmon; Wayne Koch; Harry Quon; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 3.621