Literature DB >> 23233744

Sex differences in aortic valve calcification measured by multidetector computed tomography in aortic stenosis.

Shivani R Aggarwal1, Marie-Annick Clavel, David Messika-Zeitoun, Caroline Cueff, Joseph Malouf, Philip A Araoz, Rekha Mankad, Hector Michelena, Alec Vahanian, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is the intrinsic mechanism of valvular obstruction leading to aortic stenosis (AS) and is measurable by multidetector computed tomography. The link between sex and AS is controversial and that with AVC is unknown. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We prospectively performed multidetector computed tomography in 665 patients with AS (aortic valve area, 1.05±0.35 cm(2); mean gradient, 39±19 mm Hg) to measure AVC and to assess the impact of sex on the AVC-AS severity link in men and women. AS severity was comparable between women and men (peak aortic jet velocity: 4.05±0.99 versus 3.93±0.91 m/s, P=0.11; aortic valve area index: 0.55±0.20 versus 0.56±0.18 cm(2)/m(2); P=0.46). Conversely, AVC load was lower in women versus men (1703±1321 versus 2694±1628 arbitrary units; P<0.0001) even after adjustment for their smaller body surface area or aortic annular area (both P<0.0001). Thus, odds of high-AVC load were much greater in men than in women (odds ratio, 5.07; P<0.0001). Although AVC showed good associations with hemodynamic AS severity in men and women (all r>0.67; P<0.0001), for any level of AS severity measured by peak aortic jet velocity or aortic valve area index, AVC load, absolute or indexed, was higher in men versus women (all P≤0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In this large AS population, women incurred similar AS severity than men for lower AVC loads, even after indexing for their smaller body size. Hence, the relationship between valvular calcification process and AS severity differs in women and men, warranting further pathophysiological inquiry. For AS severity diagnostic purposes, interpretation of AVC load should be different in men and in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233744     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.980052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  58 in total

1.  The impact of gender on cardiovascular system calcification in very elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Luckmini Liyanage; Nam Ju Lee; Tessa Cook; Howard C Herrmann; Dinesh Jagasia; Harold Litt; Yuchi Han
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Pathophysiology of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Is It Both Fibrocalcific and Sex Specific?

Authors:  Yoginee Sritharen; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Hartzell V Schaff; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Jordan D Miller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-05

Review 3.  Challenges in Aortic Valve Stenosis: Low-Flow States Diagnosis, Management, and a Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; Todd L Kiefer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  The role of dobutamine stress echocardiography based projected aortic valve area in assessing patients with classical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Mohinder R Vindhyal; Paul M Ndunda; Zaher Fanari
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

5.  Sex, Race, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Patients With Aortic Stenosis (from a Nationwide Inpatient Sample).

Authors:  Hind A Beydoun; May A Beydoun; Hailun Liang; Greg A Dore; Danielle Shaked; Alan B Zonderman; Shaker M Eid
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Sex-Specific Considerations in Women with Aortic Stenosis and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Christos G Mihos; Sheila L Klassen; Evin Yucel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-06-19

7.  Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot; David Messika-Zeitoun; Romain Capoulade; Joseph Malouf; Shivani Aggarval; Phillip A Araoz; Hector I Michelena; Caroline Cueff; Eric Larose; Jordan D Miller; Alec Vahanian; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Sex-related differences in matrix remodeling and early osteogenic markers in aortic valvular interstitial cells.

Authors:  Shirin Masjedi; Ying Lei; Jenny Patel; Zannatul Ferdous
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Sex Differences in the Utilization and Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Zakeih Chaker; Vinay Badhwar; Fahad Alqahtani; Sami Aljohani; Chad J Zack; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Mohamad Alkhouli
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Valvular Heart Disease in Women, Differential Remodeling, and Response to New Therapies.

Authors:  Jaya Chandrasekhar; George Dangas; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.