Literature DB >> 2323373

The relative efficacy of monopolar vs. bipolar electrodes in stimulation-produced analgesia.

B E Thorn1, L Applegate, K Jones.   

Abstract

Focal brain stimulation (FBS) of the periaqueductal gray (PAG) produces reliable antinociception. The use of different electrode configurations alters the distribution of excitation as well as the locus of cells being stimulated, making it difficult to compare results across laboratories. This study compared the analgesic properties of bipolar electrodes delivering biphasic current and monopolar electrodes delivering either a biphasic or a monophasic current to the ventral PAG. Naloxone reversibility of the analgesia was also tested. Results indicate that biphasic current with either monopolar or bipolar electrodes is more likely to elicit analgesia than monophasic current using monopolar electrodes. Naloxone reversed the analgesia produced by the monopolar/monophasic model, but only attenuated the monopolar/biphasic FBS and did not affect the analgesia produced by the bipolar/biphasic configuration. Biphasic current delivered through bipolar electrodes results in the sequential activation of different cell populations. Use of bipolar electrodes may widen the distribution of excitation beyond that of either monopolar configuration. Thus, a wider neural field of excitation may cause a bleedover of the field of stimulation into two systems (one opiate and one nonopiate).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2323373     DOI: 10.1007/bf00608235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  10 in total

Review 1.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review.

Authors:  J B Ranck
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-11-21       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Ability of periaqueductal gray subdivisions and adjacent loci to elicit analgesia and ability of naloxone to reverse analgesia.

Authors:  B E Thorn; L Applegate; S W Johnson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  Sources of variability in the sensation of pain.

Authors:  Howard L Fields
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  A reinvestigation of the analgesic effects induced by stimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter in the rat. II. Differential characteristics of the analgesia induced by ventral and dorsal PAG stimulation.

Authors:  V Fardin; J L Oliveras; J M Besson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-07-23       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Evidence for opioid and non-opioid forms of stimulation-produced analgesia in the rat.

Authors:  J T Cannon; G J Prieto; A Lee; J C Liebeskind
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Analgesia from electrical stimulation in the brainstem of the rat.

Authors:  D J Mayer; T L Wolfle; H Akil; B Carder; J C Liebeskind
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Surgery in the rat during electrical analgesia induced by focal brain stimulation.

Authors:  D V Reynolds
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A reinvestigation of the analgesic effects induced by stimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter in the rat. I. The production of behavioral side effects together with analgesia.

Authors:  V Fardin; J L Oliveras; J M Besson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-07-23       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Autopsy analysis of the safety, efficacy and cartography of electrical stimulation of the central gray in humans.

Authors:  D S Baskin; W R Mehler; Y Hosobuchi; D E Richardson; J E Adams; M A Flitter
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-04-23       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  The dorsal raphe nucleus: a re-evaluation of its proposed role in opiate analgesia systems.

Authors:  D S Klatt; M J Guinan; E S Culhane; E Carstens; L R Watkins
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1988-05-03       Impact factor: 3.252

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.