BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Objective imaging methods to identify optimal candidates for late recanalization therapies are needed. The study goals were (1) to develop magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) multiparametric, voxel-based predictive models of infarct core and penumbra in acute ischemic stroke patients, and (2) to develop patient-level imaging criteria for favorable penumbral pattern based on good clinical outcome in response to successful recanalization. METHODS: An analysis of imaging and clinical data was performed on 2 cohorts of patients (one screened with CT, the other with MRI) who underwent successful treatment for large vessel, anterior circulation stroke. Subjects were divided 2:1 into derivation and validation cohorts. Pretreatment imaging parameters independently predicting final tissue infarct and final clinical outcome were identified. RESULTS: The MRI and CT models were developed and validated from 34 and 32 patients, using 943 320 and 1 236 917 voxels, respectively. The derivation MRI and 2-branch CT models had an overall accuracy of 74% and 80%, respectively, and were independently validated with an accuracy of 71% and 79%, respectively. The imaging criteria of (1) predicted infarct core ≤90 mL and (2) ratio of predicted infarct tissue within the at-risk region ≤70% identified patients as having a favorable penumbral pattern with 78% to 100% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS:Multiparametric voxel-based MRI and CT models were developed to predict the extent of infarct core and overall penumbral pattern status in patients with acute ischemic stroke who may be candidates for late recanalization therapies. These models provide an alternative approach to mismatch in predicting ultimate tissue fate.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Objective imaging methods to identify optimal candidates for late recanalization therapies are needed. The study goals were (1) to develop magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) multiparametric, voxel-based predictive models of infarct core and penumbra in acute ischemic strokepatients, and (2) to develop patient-level imaging criteria for favorable penumbral pattern based on good clinical outcome in response to successful recanalization. METHODS: An analysis of imaging and clinical data was performed on 2 cohorts of patients (one screened with CT, the other with MRI) who underwent successful treatment for large vessel, anterior circulation stroke. Subjects were divided 2:1 into derivation and validation cohorts. Pretreatment imaging parameters independently predicting final tissue infarct and final clinical outcome were identified. RESULTS: The MRI and CT models were developed and validated from 34 and 32 patients, using 943 320 and 1 236 917 voxels, respectively. The derivation MRI and 2-branch CT models had an overall accuracy of 74% and 80%, respectively, and were independently validated with an accuracy of 71% and 79%, respectively. The imaging criteria of (1) predicted infarct core ≤90 mL and (2) ratio of predicted infarct tissue within the at-risk region ≤70% identified patients as having a favorable penumbral pattern with 78% to 100% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric voxel-based MRI and CT models were developed to predict the extent of infarct core and overall penumbral pattern status in patients with acute ischemic stroke who may be candidates for late recanalization therapies. These models provide an alternative approach to mismatch in predicting ultimate tissue fate.
Authors: Chelsea S Kidwell; Reza Jahan; Jeffry R Alger; Timothy J Schaewe; Judy Guzy; Sidney Starkman; Robert Elashoff; Jeffrey Gornbein; Val Nenov; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: B D Murphy; A J Fox; D H Lee; D J Sahlas; S E Black; M J Hogan; S B Coutts; A M Demchuk; M Goyal; R I Aviv; S Symons; I B Gulka; V Beletsky; D Pelz; V Hachinski; R Chan; T-Y Lee Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-06-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Werner Hacke; Markku Kaste; Erich Bluhmki; Miroslav Brozman; Antoni Dávalos; Donata Guidetti; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Zakaria Medeghri; Thomas Machnig; Dietmar Schneider; Rüdiger von Kummer; Nils Wahlgren; Danilo Toni Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; Mark W Parsons; Christopher Levi; Kenneth S Butcher; Andre Peeters; P Alan Barber; Christopher Bladin; Deidre A De Silva; Graham Byrnes; Jonathan B Chalk; John N Fink; Thomas E Kimber; David Schultz; Peter J Hand; Judith Frayne; Graeme Hankey; Keith Muir; Richard Gerraty; Brian M Tress; Patricia M Desmond Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Werner Hacke; Anthony J Furlan; Yasir Al-Rawi; Antoni Davalos; Jochen B Fiebach; Franz Gruber; Markku Kaste; Leslie J Lipka; Salvador Pedraza; Peter A Ringleb; Howard A Rowley; Dietmar Schneider; Lee H Schwamm; Joaquin Serena Leal; Mariola Söhngen; Phil A Teal; Karin Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi; Max Wintermark; Steven Warach Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-12-25 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Blake D Murphy; Allan J Fox; Donald H Lee; Demetrios J Sahlas; Sandra E Black; Matthew J Hogan; Shelagh B Coutts; Andrew M Demchuk; Mayank Goyal; Richard I Aviv; Sean Symons; Irene B Gulka; Vadim Beletsky; David Pelz; Richard K Chan; Ting-Yim Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nils Wahlgren; Niaz Ahmed; Niclas Eriksson; Franz Aichner; Erich Bluhmki; Antoni Dávalos; Terttu Erilä; Gary A Ford; Martin Grond; Werner Hacke; Michael G Hennerici; Markku Kaste; Martin Köhrmann; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Thomas Machnig; Risto O Roine; Danilo Toni; Geert Vanhooren Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Wataru Kakuda; Maarten G Lansberg; Vincent N Thijs; Stephanie M Kemp; Roland Bammer; Lawrence R Wechsler; Michael E Moseley; Michael P Marks; Michael P Parks; Gregory W Albers Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2008-01-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: R Gasparotti; M Grassi; D Mardighian; M Frigerio; M Pavia; R Liserre; M Magoni; L Mascaro; A Padovani; A Pezzini Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Masashi Takasawa; P Simon Jones; Joseph V Guadagno; Soren Christensen; Tim D Fryer; Sally Harding; Jonathan H Gillard; Guy B Williams; Franklin I Aigbirhio; Elizabeth A Warburton; Leif Østergaard; Jean-Claude Baron Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Hongyu An; Andria L Ford; Yasheng Chen; Hongtu Zhu; Rosana Ponisio; Gyanendra Kumar; Amirali Modir Shanechi; Naim Khoury; Katie D Vo; Jennifer Williams; Colin P Derdeyn; Michael N Diringer; Peter Panagos; William J Powers; Jin-Moo Lee; Weili Lin Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Clinton D Morgan; Marcus Stephens; Scott L Zuckerman; Magarya S Waitara; Peter J Morone; Michael C Dewan; J Mocco Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Christopher R Durst; Prashant Raghavan; Mark E Shaffrey; David Schiff; M Beatriz Lopes; Jason P Sheehan; Nicholas J Tustison; James T Patrie; Wenjun Xin; W Jeff Elias; Kenneth C Liu; Greg A Helm; A Cupino; Max Wintermark Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Matthew B Bevers; Thomas W K Battey; Ann-Christin Ostwaldt; Reza Jahan; Jeffrey L Saver; W Taylor Kimberly; Chelsea S Kidwell Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Chelsea S Kidwell; Reza Jahan; Jeffrey Gornbein; Jeffry R Alger; Val Nenov; Zahra Ajani; Lei Feng; Brett C Meyer; Scott Olson; Lee H Schwamm; Albert J Yoo; Randolph S Marshall; Philip M Meyers; Dileep R Yavagal; Max Wintermark; Judy Guzy; Sidney Starkman; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Avigdor Leftin; Jens T Rosenberg; Xuegang Yuan; Teng Ma; Samuel C Grant; Lucio Frydman Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 4.044