Literature DB >> 23233356

Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: telephone contact with long-term non-attendees in Sweden. Results from RACOMIP, a randomized controlled trial.

Gudrun Broberg1, Junmei Miao Jonasson, Joy Ellis, Dorte Gyrd-Hansen, Birgitta Anjemark, Anna Glantz, Lotta Söderberg, Mare-Liis Ryd, Mikael Holtenman, Ian Milsom, Björn Strander.   

Abstract

Non-participation is the foremost screening-related risk factor for cervical cancer. We studied the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to increase participation in the context of a well-run screening program. Telephone contact with non-attendees, offering an appointment to take a smear, was compared with a control group in a population-based randomized trial in western Sweden. Of 8,800 randomly selected women aged 30-62, without a registered Pap smear in the two latest screening rounds, 4,000 were randomized to a telephone arm, another 800 were offered a high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) self-test by mail (not reported in this article) and 4,000 constituted a control group. Endpoints were frequency of testing, frequency of abnormal smears and further assessment of abnormal tests. Participation during the following 12 months was significantly higher in the telephone arm than in the control group, 718 (18.0%) versus 422 (10.6%) [RR: 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52-1.90]. The number of detected abnormal smears was 39 and 19, respectively (RR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.19-3.55). The respective numbers of further assessed abnormalities were 34 and 18 (RR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.07-3.34). Twice as many high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) were detected and treated in the telephone arm: 14 and 7, respectively. Telephone contact with women who have abstained from cervical cancer screening for long time increases participation and leads to a significant increase in detection of atypical smears. Cost calculations indicate that this intervention is unlikely to be cost-generating and this strategy is feasible in the context of a screening program.
Copyright © 2012 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23233356     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  16 in total

1.  The value of improving failures within a cervical cancer screening program: an example from Norway.

Authors:  Emily A Burger; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  The Effects of Theory-Based Educational Intervention and WhatsApp Follow-up on Papanicolaou Smear Uptake Among Postnatal Women in Malaysia: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Zaahirah Mohammad; Norliza Ahmad; Anisah Baharom
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.947

3.  The Effects of an Educational Intervention on Preventing Cervical Cancer Among Vietnamese Women in Southern Taiwan.

Authors:  Fang-Hsin Lee; Hsiu-Hung Wang; Yung-Mei Yang; Hsiu-Min Tsai; Joh-Jong Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06

5.  Effect of Fee on Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance--ScreenFee, a Swedish Population-Based Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Emilia Alfonzo; Agneta Andersson Ellström; Szilard Nemes; Björn Strander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Gudrun Broberg; Jiangrong Wang; Anna-Lena Östberg; Annsofie Adolfsson; Szilard Nemes; Pär Sparén; Björn Strander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin Tiro; William Barlow; Hongyuan Gao; John Lin; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health.

Authors:  Melissa J Palmer; Nicholas Henschke; Gemma Villanueva; Nicola Maayan; Hanna Bergman; Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin; Marita S Fønhus; Tigest Tamrat; Garrett L Mehl; Caroline Free
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-14

9.  The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.

Authors:  Anni Virtanen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Stepwise strategy to improve Cervical Cancer Screening Adherence (SCAN-CC): automated text messages, phone calls and face-to-face interviews: protocol of a population-based randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  João Firmino-Machado; Romeu Mendes; Amélia Moreira; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.