Literature DB >> 23233259

Behavior of visual field index in advanced glaucoma.

Harsha L Rao1, Sirisha Senthil, Nikhil S Choudhari, Anil K Mandal, Chandra S Garudadri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the magnitude of Visual Field Index (VFI) change attributable to change in the estimation algorithm from the pattern deviation probability plot (PDPP) to the total deviation probability plot (TDPP) when the mean deviation (MD) crosses -20 decibels (dB).
METHODS: In a retrospective study, 37 stable glaucoma eyes in which MD of the VFs crossed -20 dB were identified. For each eye, a pair of VFs was selected so that one VF of the pair had a MD better than but close to -20 dB and the other had a MD worse than but again close to -20 dB. The change in VFI in the VF pairs and its associations with the number of points in probability plots with normal threshold sensitivities were evaluated. Similar pairs of VFs from 28 stable glaucoma eyes where the MD crossed -10 dB were chosen as controls.
RESULTS: The change in VFI in VF pairs when the MD crossed 20 dB ranged from 3% to 33% (median: 15%), while the change when MD crossed -10 dB ranged from 1% to 8% (median: 4%). Difference in the number of points with normal threshold sensitivities in PDPP when MD was better than -20 dB compared to those in TDPP when MD crossed -20 dB significantly influenced the VFI change (R(2) = 0.65). Considering the eccentricity of these points further explained the VFI change (R(2) = 0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in VFI when MD crosses -20 dB can be highly variable. This has to be considered with the use of VFI in clinical and research settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23233259     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-10836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  11 in total

1.  Detecting Change Using Standard Global Perimetric Indices in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Predictive Factors for the Rate of Visual Field Progression in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study.

Authors:  Xinbo Zhang; Richard K Parrish; David S Greenfield; Brian A Francis; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; Ou Tan; David Huang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Linda M Zangwill; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Min Hee Suh; Siamak Yousefi; Luke J Saunders; Akram Belghith; Patricia Isabel C Manalastas; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Clinicians' Use of Quantitative Information while Assessing the Rate of Functional Progression in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Robert M Kinast; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Donald L Budenz; Jin Wook Jeoung; John T Lind; Jonathan S Myers; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Lindsay A Rhodes; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Teresa C Chen; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2022-03-12

5.  Changes of visual-field global indices after cataract surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Bo Ram Seol; Jin Wook Jeoung; Ki Ho Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Response to Letter to the Editor: Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Visual Field Progression in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.

Authors:  Harsha L Rao; Thanemozhi Srinivasan; Zia S Pradhan; Shruthi Sreenivasaiah; Dhanaraj A S Rao; Narendra K Puttaiah; Sathi Devi; Sasan Moghimi; Kaweh Mansouri; Carroll A B Webers; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.290

7.  Detection of progression of glaucomatous visual field damage using the point-wise method with the binomial test.

Authors:  Ayako Karakawa; Hiroshi Murata; Hiroyo Hirasawa; Chihiro Mayama; Ryo Asaoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Method to Measure the Rate of Glaucomatous Visual Field Change.

Authors:  Joseph Caprioli; Lilian Mohamed; Esteban Morales; Alessandro Rabiolo; Nathaniel Sears; Hirunpatravong Pradtana; Reza Alizadeh; Fei Yu; Abdelmonem A Afifi; Anne L Coleman; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Assessing glaucoma deterioration using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test.

Authors:  Parul Ichhpujani; Tanu Singh; Sahil Thakur; Rohan Bir Singh; Suresh Kumar
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-28

10.  Visual function evaluation for low vision patients with advanced glaucoma.

Authors:  Soo Ji Jeon; Younhea Jung; Chang-Sub Jung; Hae-Young Lopilly Park; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.