Literature DB >> 23233178

Early failures in large head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Martje N R Althuizen1, Miranda L V Hooff, Saskia H M v d Berg-v Erp, Jacques V Limbeek, Marc W Nijhof.   

Abstract

Concerns have recently been raised about large head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (LDH THA). Metal ion release due to wear may cause osteolysis, pseudotumours and necrosis. In addition, fixation of certain acetabular components is thought to be suboptimal. We present the short term outcome of the Durom LDH THA. Retrospectively, a consecutive series of 64 implants in 60 patients was analysed with a mean follow-up of 37 months. Clinical and radiological evaluation was performed on a regular basis, followed by additional evaluations when indicated. The 10-year revision percentage was calculated and compared with National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) standards. Six patients (six hips) underwent cup revision (9%). Four of these cups showed no or minimal bone fixation. Three patients had a pseudotumour. In two revision cases, ALVAL (aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion) was present. Lack of bone ingrowth and the presence of ARMD (adverse reaction to metal debris) seem to contribute to a high failure rate of the Durom LDH THA. The predicted ten-year revision rate of 14.2% (95% CI 5.6-22.8) is, given the broad confidence interval, not significantly outside NICE recommended standards. However, it is not clear which factors, if any, predict implant failure. Therefore, we do not advocate the use of this implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233178     DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2012.10340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  4 in total

1.  Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Keri L Satterwhite
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

4.  Comparison of short-stem versus conventional stem for hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: 7-14 years follow-up.

Authors:  Arnaldo Sousa; João Vale; Sara Diniz; Pedro Neves; Joaquim Ramos; Rafaela Coelho
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.