Literature DB >> 23233168

Scaling of standard metabolic rate in estuarine crocodiles Crocodylus porosus.

Roger S Seymour1, C M Gienger, Matthew L Brien, Christopher R Tracy, S Charlie Manolis, Grahame J W Webb, Keith A Christian.   

Abstract

Standard metabolic rate (SMR, ml O2 min(-1)) of captive Crocodylus porosus at 30 °C scales with body mass (kg) according to the equation, SMR = 1.01 M(0.829), in animals ranging in body mass of 3.3 orders of magnitude (0.19-389 kg). The exponent is significantly higher than 0.75, so does not conform to quarter-power scaling theory, but rather is likely an emergent property with no single explanation. SMR at 1 kg body mass is similar to the literature for C. porosus and for alligators. The high exponent is not related to feeding, growth, or obesity of captive animals. The log-transformed data appear slightly curved, mainly because SMR is somewhat low in many of the largest animals (291-389 kg). A 3-parameter model is scarcely different from the linear one, but reveals a declining exponent between 0.862 and 0.798. A non-linear model on arithmetic axes overestimates SMR in 70% of the smallest animals and does not satisfactorily represent the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233168     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-012-0732-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  33 in total

1.  Distributive network model of Banavar, Damuth, Maritan and Rinaldo (2002): critique and perspective.

Authors:  Anastassia M Makarieva; Victor G Gorshkov; Bai-Lian Li
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Allometric exponents do not support a universal metabolic allometry.

Authors:  Craig R White; Phillip Cassey; Tim M Blackburn
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 3.  Specific dynamic action: a review of the postprandial metabolic response.

Authors:  Stephen M Secor
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 4.  A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants.

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2009-11-06

5.  Physiological and morphological responses to feeding in broad-nosed caiman (Caiman latirostris).

Authors:  J Matthias Starck; Ariovaldo P Cruz-Neto; Augusto Shinya Abe
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Increase in metabolic rate of the alligator fed proteins or amino acids.

Authors:  R A Coulson; T Hernandez
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Energy cost of whole-body protein synthesis measured in vivo in chicks.

Authors:  Y Aoyagi; I Tasaki; J Okumura; T Muramatsu
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1988

8.  Resting metabolic rates in boid snakes: allometric relationships and temperature effects.

Authors:  M A Chappell; T M Ellis
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.200

9.  Terrestrial locomotion does not constrain venous return in the American alligator, Alligator mississippiensis.

Authors:  Suzanne L Munns; Lynn K Hartzler; Albert F Bennett; James W Hicks
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Ventilation and gas exchange during treadmill locomotion in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis).

Authors:  C G Farmer; D R Carrier
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  3 in total

1.  Coevolution of body size and metabolic rate in vertebrates: a life-history perspective.

Authors:  Jan Kozłowski; Marek Konarzewski; Marcin Czarnoleski
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2020-06-10

2.  Maximal aerobic and anaerobic power generation in large crocodiles versus mammals: implications for dinosaur gigantothermy.

Authors:  Roger S Seymour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ontogenetic comparisons of standard metabolism in three species of crocodilians.

Authors:  C M Gienger; Matthew L Brien; Christopher R Tracy; S Charlie Manolis; Grahame J W Webb; Roger S Seymour; Keith A Christian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.