Literature DB >> 23232993

A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Renato A Luna1, Daniel B Nogueira, Pablo S Varela, Eduardo de O Rodrigues Neto, Maria Júlia R Norton, Luciana do Carmo B Ribeiro, Agatha M Peixoto, Yara L de Mendonça, Isidro Bendet, Rossano A Fiorelli, James P Dolan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative inflammatory response and severity of pain between single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
METHODS: Two groups of 20 patients were prospectively randomized to either conventional LC or SILS cholecystectomy. Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were assayed before surgery, at 4-6 h, and at 18-24 h after the procedure. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels also were assayed at 18-24 h after surgery. Pain was measured at each of three time points after surgery using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The number of analgesia doses administered in the first 24 h after the procedure also was recorded and 30-day surgical outcomes were documented.
RESULTS: The groups had equivalent body mass index (BMI), age, and comorbidity distribution. Peak IL-6 levels occurred 4-6 h after surgery, and the median level was 12.8 pg/ml in the LC and 8.9 pg/ml in the SILS group (p = 0.5). The median CRP level before discharge was 1.6 mg/dl in the LC and 1.9 mg/dl in the SILS group (p = 0.38). There was no difference in either analgesic use or pain intensity as measured by the VAS between the two groups (p = 0.72). The length of the surgical procedure was significantly longer in the SILS group (p < 0.001). No intraoperative complications occurred in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery does not significantly reduce systemic inflammatory response, postoperative pain, or analgesic use compared with LC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23232993     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2589-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Evangelos C Tsimoyiannis; Konstantinos E Tsimogiannis; George Pappas-Gogos; Charalampos Farantos; Nikolaos Benetatos; Paraskevi Mavridou; Adamantia Manataki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Maria A Cassera; Georg O Spaun; Chet W Hammill; Paul D Hansen; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Colleen G C McGregor; Mikael H Sodergren; Alec Aslanyan; Victoria J Wright; Sanjay Purkayastha; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Chung Ngai Tang; Patricia C L Yih; Oliver C Y Chan; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response.

Authors:  F J Vittimberga; D P Foley; W C Meyers; M P Callery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain.

Authors:  M Asakuma; M Hayashi; K Komeda; T Shimizu; F Hirokawa; Y Miyamoto; J Okuda; N Tanigawa
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve.

Authors:  Daniel Solomon; Robert L Bell; Andrew J Duffy; Kurt E Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Minimal access surgery for cholelithiasis induces an attenuated acute phase response.

Authors:  D M Bruce; M Smith; C B Walker; S D Heys; N R Binnie; D B Gough; J Broom; O Eremin
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Interleukin-6 in the injured patient. Marker of injury or mediator of inflammation?

Authors:  W L Biffl; E E Moore; F A Moore; V M Peterson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  29 in total

1.  Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a single-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study.

Authors:  José Noguera; Silvia Tejada; Carmen Tortajada; Anna Sánchez; José Muñoz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prospective assessment of trocar-specific morbidity in laparoscopy.

Authors:  Alessandra Cristaudi; Marie-Laure Matthey-Gié; Nicolas Demartines; Dimitri Christoforidis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with curved versus linear instruments assessed by systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Salvador Morales-Conde; George A Antoniou; Rudolph Pointner; Frank-Alexander Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  No inflammatory benefit obtained by single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Masayasu Hara; Kazuyoshi Shiga; Takeshi Yanagita; Nozomu Nakai; Nanako Ando; Korehito Takasu; Yuzo Maeda; Takaya Nagasaki; Takahisa Hirokawa; Yoichi Matsuo; Hideyuki Ishiguro; Hiroki Takahashi; Shuji Takiguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  The use of expanding ports in laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery may cause more pain: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Jannie Dressler; Lars N Jorgensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A Arezzo; R Passera; E Forcignanò; L Rapetti; R Cirocchi; M Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Clinical outcomes of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors:  Sung Ryol Lee; Hyung Ook Kim; Jun Ho Shin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it work? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Maria Lirici; Simone Maria Tierno; Cecilia Ponzano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Stephen Kin Yong Chang; Yi Liang Wang; Liang Shen; Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer; Krishnakumar Madhavan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A non-randomized, age-matched single center trial.

Authors:  Yoen Tk van der Linden; Koop Bosscha; Hubert A Prins; Daniel J Lips
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.