Literature DB >> 30739170

No inflammatory benefit obtained by single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy.

Masayasu Hara1, Kazuyoshi Shiga2, Takeshi Yanagita2, Nozomu Nakai2, Nanako Ando2, Korehito Takasu2, Yuzo Maeda2, Takaya Nagasaki2, Takahisa Hirokawa2, Yoichi Matsuo2, Hideyuki Ishiguro2, Hiroki Takahashi2, Shuji Takiguchi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the perioperative inflammatory mediators in a right hemicolectomy performed with single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and traditional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS) to compare the postoperative inflammatory response and feasibility of SILS with that of MLS.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 56 consecutive colorectal cancer patients who underwent right hemicolectomy prospectively. Twenty patients underwent SILS, and 36 underwent MLS. The preoperative and postoperative levels of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) as well as the number of platelet cells were measured in all patients. The operation duration, number of harvested lymph nodes, length of the resected bowel, blood loss, and duration of hospital stay were also compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Neither SILS nor MLS had any conversion cases. The operation duration was longer for MLS than for SILS. Blood loss tended to be lower among patients who underwent SILS than among those who underwent MLS. However, the number of harvested LNs was significantly lower with SILS than with MLS. In both pre- and postoperative blood examinations, there was no marked difference in inflammatory mediators between MLS and SILS.
CONCLUSION: There was no systemic inflammatory advantage associated with SILS compared with MLS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IL-6; Right hemicolectomy; SILS; Systemic inflammation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30739170     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01777-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  24 in total

1.  Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus.

Authors:  G Piskun; S Rajpal
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Transgastric versus laparoendoscopic single-site peritoneoscopy in a rat model: effects on motility, inflammation, and nociception.

Authors:  Jianqiang Guo; Neil P Pasricha; Mohan M Shenoy; Liansheng Liu; Kshama Mehta; Pankaj J Pasricha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Systemic inflammatory response after single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus standard laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Petros Ypsilantis; Vasilios Didilis; Christina Tsigalou; Michael Pitiakoudis; Anastasios Karakatsanis; Apostolos Margioulas; Constantinos Simopoulos
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.719

4.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparative study of NOTES rectosigmoidectomy in a swine model: E-NOTES vs. P-NOTES.

Authors:  D K Sohn; S-Y Jeong; J W Park; J S Kim; J H Hwang; D-W Kim; S-B Kang; J H Oh
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Single-center experience in systemic stress and short-term morbidity of single-incision cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Farid Froghi; Mikael H Sodergren; Victoria J Wright; Ross Coomber; Alan P Courtney; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Single-incision versus three-port conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: is there any real need to go single?

Authors:  Giuseppe Currò; Andrea Cogliandolo; Salvatore Lazzara; Giuseppe La Malfa; Giuseppe Navarra
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: safety and feasibility in a series of consecutive cases.

Authors:  Diego I Ramos-Valadez; Chirag B Patel; Madhu Ragupathi; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results.

Authors:  William Tzu-Liang Chen; Sheng-Chi Chang; Hua-Che Chiang; Wan-Yu Lo; Long-Bin Jeng; Christina Wu; Tao-Wei Ke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis.

Authors:  W M Chambers; M Bicsak; M Lamparelli; A R Dixon
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical and pathological outcomes.

Authors:  Gangmi Kim; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 1.627

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.