Literature DB >> 23232854

BRCA1 immunohistochemistry in a molecularly characterized cohort of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas.

Karuna Garg1, Douglas A Levine, Narciso Olvera, Fanny Dao, Maria Bisogna, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Andrew Berchuck, Ethan Cerami, Nikolaus Schultz, Robert A Soslow.   

Abstract

BRCA1 and BRCA2 dysfunction, frequently seen in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, often results from germline mutations, somatic mutations, and promoter methylation. Identification of tumors with BRCA defects has therapeutic and prognostic implications. Identifying germline BRCA mutations is also important given the increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian carcinoma. Our goal was to assess whether immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) for BRCA1 is an effective method for the detection of BRCA1 dysfunction in molecularly characterized high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. We identified 43 high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas with known events in BRCA1 and BRCA2 included in The Cancer Genome Atlas Project. BRCA1 stain was first assessed without knowledge of the BRCA status, and a semiquantitative assessment for intensity and amount of staining was performed. The stains were reevaluated and divided into 3 categories (retained, loss, and equivocal) on the basis of correlation with genotyping data. Presence of retained BRCA staining was considered normal, whereas the other patterns, including equivocal staining or loss of staining, were considered abnormal. Two pathologists, blinded to the BRCA status, then scored 2 sets of validation cases selected on the basis of available molecular data-1 with only germline mutation status available (n=31) and 1 with comprehensive genomic data (n=39). The pathologists agreed 88% of the time in the training set and 91% in the validation sets. In the training set, abnormal BRCA staining was seen in 24 cases, of which 21 (87%) showed BRCA1 genetic abnormalities, 1 showed BRCA2 mutations, and 2 showed no BRCA abnormalities. Abnormal BRCA1 staining was noted in all 5 cases with BRCA1 germline mutations, in 3 (60%) of 5 with BRCA1 somatic mutations, and in 13 (93%) of 14 with BRCA1 promoter methylation. The 2 validation sets included 70 additional patients, and all cases with germline BRCA1 mutations (n=11) showed abnormal BRCA1 staining. Tumors with BRCA1 promoter methylation also showed abnormal staining in 6 (86%) of 7 cases. In the entire study, no cases with BRCA1 germline mutation showed intact immunostaining (negative predictive value=100%). This study shows that BRCA1 IHC is well correlated with molecular events in ovarian carcinoma. Considering the high negative predictive value for germline mutations, BRCA1 IHC appears to be an effective approach to stratify patients for germline genetic testing and to detect other mechanisms of BRCA1 dysfunction in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23232854      PMCID: PMC3531916          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826cabbd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  22 in total

Review 1.  Cancer of the ovary.

Authors:  Stephen A Cannistra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) protein expression as a prognostic marker in sporadic epithelial ovarian carcinoma: an NCIC CTG OV.16 correlative study.

Authors:  J I Weberpals; D Tu; J A Squire; M S Amin; S Islam; L B Pelletier; A M O'Brien; P J Hoskins; E A Eisenhauer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Improved survival in women with BRCA-associated ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Ilana Cass; Rae Lynn Baldwin; Taz Varkey; Roxana Moslehi; Steven A Narod; Beth Y Karlan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Selection of endometrial carcinomas for DNA mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry using patient age and tumor morphology enhances detection of mismatch repair abnormalities.

Authors:  Karuna Garg; Mario M Leitao; Noah D Kauff; Jessica Hansen; Kristi Kosarin; Jinru Shia; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Asad Umar; C Richard Boland; Jonathan P Terdiman; Sapna Syngal; Albert de la Chapelle; Josef Rüschoff; Richard Fishel; Noralane M Lindor; Lawrence J Burgart; Richard Hamelin; Stanley R Hamilton; Robert A Hiatt; Jeremy Jass; Annika Lindblom; Henry T Lynch; Païvi Peltomaki; Scott D Ramsey; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Hans F A Vasen; Ernest T Hawk; J Carl Barrett; Andrew N Freedman; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Lynch syndrome screening strategies among newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Kimberly Resnick; J Michael Straughn; Floor Backes; Heather Hampel; Kellie S Matthews; David E Cohn
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Heterogenic loss of the wild-type BRCA allele in human breast tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Tari A King; Weiwei Li; Edi Brogi; Cindy J Yee; Mary L Gemignani; Narciso Olvera; Douglas A Levine; Larry Norton; Mark E Robson; Kenneth Offit; Patrick I Borgen; Jeff Boyd
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Utility of immunohistochemistry in predicting microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ippolito Modica; Robert A Soslow; Destin Black; Carmen Tornos; Noah Kauff; Jinru Shia
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Familial breast/ovarian cancer and BRCA1/2 genetic screening: the role of immunohistochemistry as an additional method in the selection of patients.

Authors:  Fátima H Vaz; Patrícia M Machado; Rita D Brandão; Cátia T Laranjeira; Joana S Eugénio; Aires H Fernandes; Saudade P André
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.479

10.  Screening of BRCA1 mutation using immunohistochemical staining with C-terminal and N-terminal antibodies in familial ovarian cancers.

Authors:  K Kashima; T Oite; Y Aoki; K Takakuwa; H Aida; H Nagata; M Sekine; H J Wu; Y Hirai; Y Wada; K Yamamoto; K Hasegawa; T Sonoda; T Maruo; I Nagata; M Ohno; M Suzuki; I Kobayashi; K Kuzuya; T Takahashi; Y Torii; K Tanaka
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-04
View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  [Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer].

Authors:  S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Assessment of PARP protein expression in epithelial ovarian cancer by ELISA pharmacodynamic assay and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  K Veskimäe; S Staff; A Grönholm; M Pesu; M Laaksonen; M Nykter; J Isola; J Mäenpää
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-05-07

3.  Sox2 gene amplification significantly impacts overall survival in serous epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jimmy Belotte; Nicole M Fletcher; Mitchell Alexis; Robert T Morris; Adnan R Munkarah; Michael P Diamond; Ghassan M Saed
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  The performance of BRCA1 immunohistochemistry for detecting germline, somatic, and epigenetic BRCA1 loss in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J L Meisel; D M Hyman; K Garg; Q Zhou; F Dao; M Bisogna; J Gao; N D Schultz; R N Grisham; M Phillips; A Iasonos; N D Kauff; D A Levine; R A Soslow; D R Spriggs
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  The expression of DBC1/CCAR2 is associated with poor prognosis of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Cho; Ho Park; See-Hyoung Park; Kyoung Kim; Myoung Chung; Woo Moon; Myoung Kang; Kyu Jang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Expression of DNA Damage Response Molecules PARP1, γH2AX, BRCA1, and BRCA2 Predicts Poor Survival of Breast Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  See-Hyoung Park; Sang Jae Noh; Kyoung Min Kim; Jun Sang Bae; Keun Sang Kwon; Sung Hoo Jung; Jung Ryul Kim; Ho Lee; Myoung Ja Chung; Woo Sung Moon; Myoung Jae Kang; Kyu Yun Jang
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Hereditary risk evaluation for borderline ovarian tumors based on immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Jung Min Park; Min Kyu Kim
Journal:  J Menopausal Med       Date:  2014-04-28

8.  Association and prognostic significance of BRCA1/2-mutation status with neoantigen load, number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in high grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kyle C Strickland; Brooke E Howitt; Sachet A Shukla; Scott Rodig; Lauren L Ritterhouse; Joyce F Liu; Judy E Garber; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Catherine J Wu; Alan D D'Andrea; Ursula A Matulonis; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-22

9.  Uterine Cancer After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy Without Hysterectomy in Women With BRCA Mutations.

Authors:  Catherine A Shu; Malcolm C Pike; Anjali R Jotwani; Tara M Friebel; Robert A Soslow; Douglas A Levine; Katherine L Nathanson; Jason A Konner; Angela G Arnold; Faina Bogomolniy; Fanny Dao; Narciso Olvera; Elizabeth K Bancroft; Deborah J Goldfrank; Zsofia K Stadler; Mark E Robson; Carol L Brown; Mario M Leitao; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Carol A Aghajanian; Joanne L Blum; Susan L Neuhausen; Judy E Garber; Mary B Daly; Claudine Isaacs; Rosalind A Eeles; Patricia A Ganz; Richard R Barakat; Kenneth Offit; Susan M Domchek; Timothy R Rebbeck; Noah D Kauff
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Epigenetic, genetic and environmental interactions in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from northeast India.

Authors:  Fazlur Rahman Talukdar; Sankar Kumar Ghosh; Ruhina Shirin Laskar; Rosy Mondal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.