Literature DB >> 19238076

Selection of endometrial carcinomas for DNA mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry using patient age and tumor morphology enhances detection of mismatch repair abnormalities.

Karuna Garg1, Mario M Leitao, Noah D Kauff, Jessica Hansen, Kristi Kosarin, Jinru Shia, Robert A Soslow.   

Abstract

Women with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) have a high risk for endometrial cancer (EC) and frequently present with a gynecologic cancer as their first or sentinel malignancy. Identification of these patients is important given their personal and family risk for synchronous and metachronous tumors. The revised Bethesda Guidelines provide screening criteria for HNPCC in colorectal cancers. However, there are currently no such screening recommendations for women with endometrial carcinoma. We applied some of the colorectal cancer screening criteria, including age and tumor morphology, to endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to describe patient and tumor characteristics and to assess the ability of these criteria to enhance detection of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, and hence HNPCC in EC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for DNA mismatch repair (IHC-MMR) proteins was performed in a defined subset of patients with EC. This included women younger than 50 years of age and women >or=50 years whose tumors showed morphologic features suggestive of MMR deficiency (TM-MMR). The extent of IHC-MMR in the older patient group was compared with that in a comparison group of EC >or=50 years that was previously analyzed for microsatellite instability status. Seventy-one patients met the selection criteria for IHC testing; 32 (45%) showed abnormal results. The rate of IHC abnormality in the younger group was approximately 30% with a nearly equal distribution of MLH1/PMS2 and MSH2/MSH6 abnormalities. In the older age group, TM-MMR triggered IHC analysis in 31 of 34 cases. Of these, 18 cases showed loss of IHC-MMR (58% of cases), 7 with loss of MSH2/MSH6. In contrast, the rate of microsatellite instability in the comparison group was only 21%. The IHC abnormal group showed more frequent tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, dedifferentiated EC, more tumors centered in the lower uterine segment, and more frequent synchronous clear cell carcinomas of the ovary than tumors with a normal immunophenotype. Although many of the patients with loss of IHC-MMR showed personal and/or family history (13 of 32) of HNPCC-associated tumors, most did not. Tumor morphology (TM-MMR) along with IHC-MMR enhances the detection of EC patients at risk of HNPCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19238076     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318197a046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  52 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 2: TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Shona Hendry; Roberto Salgado; Thomas Gevaert; Prudence A Russell; Tom John; Bibhusal Thapa; Michael Christie; Koen van de Vijver; M V Estrada; Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Melinda Sanders; Benjamin Solomon; Cinzia Solinas; Gert G G M Van den Eynden; Yves Allory; Matthias Preusser; Johannes Hainfellner; Giancarlo Pruneri; Andrea Vingiani; Sandra Demaria; Fraser Symmans; Paolo Nuciforo; Laura Comerma; E A Thompson; Sunil Lakhani; Seong-Rim Kim; Stuart Schnitt; Cecile Colpaert; Christos Sotiriou; Stefan J Scherer; Michail Ignatiadis; Sunil Badve; Robert H Pierce; Giuseppe Viale; Nicolas Sirtaine; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Tomohagu Sugie; Susan Fineberg; Soonmyung Paik; Ashok Srinivasan; Andrea Richardson; Yihong Wang; Ewa Chmielik; Jane Brock; Douglas B Johnson; Justin Balko; Stephan Wienert; Veerle Bossuyt; Stefan Michiels; Nils Ternes; Nicole Burchardi; Stephen J Luen; Peter Savas; Frederick Klauschen; Peter H Watson; Brad H Nelson; Carmen Criscitiello; Sandra O'Toole; Denis Larsimont; Roland de Wind; Giuseppe Curigliano; Fabrice André; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Mark van de Vijver; Federico Rojo; Giuseppe Floris; Shahinaz Bedri; Joseph Sparano; David Rimm; Torsten Nielsen; Zuzana Kos; Stephen Hewitt; Baljit Singh; Gelareh Farshid; Sibylle Loibl; Kimberly H Allison; Nadine Tung; Sylvia Adams; Karen Willard-Gallo; Hugo M Horlings; Leena Gandhi; Andre Moreira; Fred Hirsch; Maria V Dieci; Maria Urbanowicz; Iva Brcic; Konstanty Korski; Fabien Gaire; Hartmut Koeppen; Amy Lo; Jennifer Giltnane; Marlon C Rebelatto; Keith E Steele; Jiping Zha; Kenneth Emancipator; Jonathan W Juco; Carsten Denkert; Jorge Reis-Filho; Sherene Loi; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.875

2.  Clinicopathological analysis of endometrial carcinomas harboring somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations.

Authors:  Yaser R Hussein; Britta Weigelt; Douglas A Levine; J Kenneth Schoolmeester; Linda N Dao; Bonnie L Balzer; Georgia Liles; Beth Karlan; Martin Köbel; Cheng-Han Lee; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Identification of individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome using targeted evaluations and genetic testing: National Society of Genetic Counselors and the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Colorectal Cancer joint practice guideline.

Authors:  Scott M Weissman; Randall Burt; James Church; Steve Erdman; Heather Hampel; Spring Holter; Kory Jasperson; Matt F Kalady; Joy Larsen Haidle; Henry T Lynch; Selvi Palaniappan; Paul E Wise; Leigha Senter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Lynch Syndrome Associated With PMS2 Mutation: Understanding Current Concepts.

Authors:  Shuchi Gulati; Shanna Gustafson; Hamed A Daw
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09

5.  The genetic landscape of endometrial clear cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Deborah F DeLair; Kathleen A Burke; Pier Selenica; Raymond S Lim; Sasinya N Scott; Sumit Middha; Abhinita S Mohanty; Donavan T Cheng; Michael F Berger; Robert A Soslow; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Massively parallel sequencing analysis of mucinous ovarian carcinomas: genomic profiling and differential diagnoses.

Authors:  Jennifer J Mueller; Brooke A Schlappe; Rahul Kumar; Narciso Olvera; Fanny Dao; Nadeem Abu-Rustum; Carol Aghajanian; Deborah DeLair; Yaser R Hussein; Robert A Soslow; Douglas A Levine; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Immunophenotypic features of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma - insights from BRG1/INI1-deficient tumours.

Authors:  Lien N Hoang; Yow-Shan Lee; Anthony N Karnezis; Basile Tessier-Cloutier; Noorah Almandani; Mackenzie Coatham; C Blake Gilks; Robert A Soslow; Colin J R Stewart; Martin Köbel; Cheng-Han Lee
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 8.  Update on Genetic Testing in Gynecologic Cancer.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Mark E Robson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  [New features in the 2014 WHO classification of uterine neoplasms].

Authors:  S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

10.  Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.

Authors:  Daniel D Buchanan; Yen Y Tan; Michael D Walsh; Mark Clendenning; Alexander M Metcalf; Kaltin Ferguson; Sven T Arnold; Bryony A Thompson; Felicity A Lose; Michael T Parsons; Rhiannon J Walters; Sally-Ann Pearson; Margaret Cummings; Martin K Oehler; Penelope B Blomfield; Michael A Quinn; Judy A Kirk; Colin J Stewart; Andreas Obermair; Joanne P Young; Penelope M Webb; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.