Literature DB >> 23232199

Use of advanced imaging technology and endoscopy for chronic rhinosinusitis varies by physician specialty.

Melissa A Pynnonen1, Giant Lin, Rodney L Dunn, Brent K Hollenbeck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis are cared for by multiple specialties. Endoscopy and imaging are important diagnostic tools. However, because physicians vary in their access to imaging and endoscopy, testing may vary across specialties. The purpose of this study is to characterize differences in use of imaging and endoscopy between physician specialties.
METHODS: Using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, we identified adult visits with primary, secondary, and tertiary diagnoses of chronic rhinosinusitis from 2005 through 2008. We measured rates of advanced radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, and PET) and office procedures. Logistic regression models were used to assess the bivariate and independent effects of patient, physician, and practice-level factors on use of advanced imaging and office procedures.
RESULTS: There were nearly 51 million visits for diagnoses coded as chronic rhinosinusitis, representing an average of 12.7 million visits annually. Primary care providers saw the majority of these patients. Otolaryngologists used advanced radiographic imaging at a rate higher than primary care physicians per outpatient visit (16.0% versus 1.93%; p < 0.001). Office procedures, performed almost exclusively (99.2%) by otolaryngologists, were performed at 24.5% of otolaryngology visits. Private insurance was significantly associated with a lower use of advanced radiographic imaging (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.94) among otolaryngology visits, but no patient or provider-level variables were associated with office procedure use.
CONCLUSION: Radiographic imaging and office procedures are used at a higher rate per outpatient visit by otolaryngologists than by primary care providers. Additional studies are needed to identify and characterize factors that contribute to these different rates of use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23232199      PMCID: PMC3972731          DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  16 in total

1.  Healthcare expenditures for sinusitis in 1996: contributions of asthma, rhinitis, and other airway disorders.

Authors:  N F Ray; J N Baraniuk; M Thamer; C S Rinehart; P J Gergen; M Kaliner; S Josephs; Y H Pung
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Neil Bhattacharyya; Marvin P Fried
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Guide to using masked design variables to estimate standard errors in public use files of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Authors:  Esther Hing; Sarah Gousen; Iris Shimizu; Catharine Burt
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Computed tomographic assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis with asthma.

Authors:  Hun-Jong Dhong; Hyo Yeol Kim; Young-Jun Chung; Tae Wook Kim; Joon Ho Kim; Seung-Kyu Chung; Myung-Gu Kim
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

5.  Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006.

Authors:  John R Pleis; Margaret Lethbridge-Cejku
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 10       Date:  2007-12

Review 6.  European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007.

Authors:  Wytske Fokkens; Valerie Lund; Joaquim Mullol
Journal:  Rhinol Suppl       Date:  2007

7.  Conditions that masquerade as chronic rhinosinusitis: a medical record review.

Authors:  Melissa A Pynnonen; Jeffrey E Terrell
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-07

8.  Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis.

Authors:  Richard M Rosenfeld; David Andes; Neil Bhattacharyya; Dickson Cheung; Steven Eisenberg; Theodore G Ganiats; Andrea Gelzer; Daniel Hamilos; Richard C Haydon; Patricia A Hudgins; Stacie Jones; Helene J Krouse; Lawrence H Lee; Martin C Mahoney; Bradley F Marple; Col John P Mitchell; Robert Nathan; Richard N Shiffman; Timothy L Smith; David L Witsell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 9.  Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jack B Anon; Michael R Jacobs; Michael D Poole; Paul G Ambrose; Mark S Benninger; James A Hadley; William A Craig
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 10.  Epidemiology and economic impact of rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Vijay K Anand
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2004-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  A diagnostic dilemma: chronic sinusitis diagnosed by non-otolaryngologists.

Authors:  Sarah J Novis; Sarah R Akkina; Shana Lynn; Hayley E Kern; Nahid R Keshavarzi; Melissa A Pynnonen
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.858

2.  Variations in the intensive use of head CT for elderly patients with hemorrhagic stroke.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Elliott S Fisher; Nicos Labropoulos; Weiping Zhou; Jonathan Skinner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Does an Otolaryngology-Specific Database Have Added Value? A Comparative Feasibility Analysis.

Authors:  Angela M Bellmunt; Rhonda Roberts; Walter T Lee; Kris Schulz; Melissa A Pynnonen; Matthew G Crowson; David Witsell; Kourosh Parham; Alan Langman; Andrea Vambutas; Sheila E Ryan; Jennifer J Shin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Academic institution pilot study shows far fewer diagnoses of sinusitis than reported nationally.

Authors:  Sarah R Akkina; Sarah J Novis; Nahid R Keshavarzi; Melissa A Pynnonen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.