PURPOSE: Oncogenic signaling in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is sustained via PI3K/AKT pathway. We used a panel of six GIST xenograft models to assess efficacy of GDC-0941 as single agent or in combination with imatinib (IMA). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Nude mice (n = 136) were grafted bilaterally with human GIST carrying diverse KIT mutations. Mice were orally dosed over four weeks, grouped as follows: (A) control; (B) GDC-0941; (C) imatinib, and (D) GDC+IMA treatments. Xenografts regrowth after treatment discontinuation was assessed in groups C and D for an additional four weeks. Tumor response was assessed by volume measurements, micro-PET imaging, histopathology, and immunoblotting. Moreover, genomic alterations in PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway were evaluated. RESULTS: In all models, GDC-0941 caused tumor growth stabilization, inhibiting tumor cell proliferation, but did not induce apoptosis. Under GDC+IMA, profound tumor regression, superior to either treatment alone, was observed. This effect was associated with the best histologic response, a nearly complete proliferation arrest and increased apoptosis. Tumor regrowth assays confirmed superior activity of GDC+IMA over imatinib; in three of six models, tumor volume remained reduced and stable even after treatment discontinuation. A positive correlation between response to GDC+IMA and PTEN loss, both on gene and protein levels, was found. CONCLUSION: GDC+IMA has significant antitumor efficacy in GIST xenografts, inducing more substantial tumor regression, apoptosis, and durable effects than imatinib. Notably, after treatment withdrawal, tumor regression was sustained in tumors exposed to GDC+IMA, which was not observed under imatinib. Assessment of PTEN status may represent a useful predictive biomarker for patient selection.
PURPOSE: Oncogenic signaling in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is sustained via PI3K/AKT pathway. We used a panel of six GIST xenograft models to assess efficacy of GDC-0941 as single agent or in combination with imatinib (IMA). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Nude mice (n = 136) were grafted bilaterally with human GIST carrying diverse KIT mutations. Mice were orally dosed over four weeks, grouped as follows: (A) control; (B) GDC-0941; (C) imatinib, and (D) GDC+IMA treatments. Xenografts regrowth after treatment discontinuation was assessed in groups C and D for an additional four weeks. Tumor response was assessed by volume measurements, micro-PET imaging, histopathology, and immunoblotting. Moreover, genomic alterations in PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway were evaluated. RESULTS: In all models, GDC-0941 caused tumor growth stabilization, inhibiting tumor cell proliferation, but did not induce apoptosis. Under GDC+IMA, profound tumor regression, superior to either treatment alone, was observed. This effect was associated with the best histologic response, a nearly complete proliferation arrest and increased apoptosis. Tumor regrowth assays confirmed superior activity of GDC+IMA over imatinib; in three of six models, tumor volume remained reduced and stable even after treatment discontinuation. A positive correlation between response to GDC+IMA and PTEN loss, both on gene and protein levels, was found. CONCLUSION:GDC+IMA has significant antitumor efficacy in GIST xenografts, inducing more substantial tumor regression, apoptosis, and durable effects than imatinib. Notably, after treatment withdrawal, tumor regression was sustained in tumors exposed to GDC+IMA, which was not observed under imatinib. Assessment of PTEN status may represent a useful predictive biomarker for patient selection.
Authors: Giuseppe Floris; Raf Sciot; Agnieszka Wozniak; Thomas Van Looy; Jasmien Wellens; Gavino Faa; Emmanuel Normant; Maria Debiec-Rychter; Patrick Schöffski Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Maria Debiec-Rychter; Jan Cools; Herlinde Dumez; Raf Sciot; Michel Stul; Nicole Mentens; Hilde Vranckx; Bartosz Wasag; Hans Prenen; Johannes Roesel; Anne Hagemeijer; Allan Van Oosterom; Peter Marynen Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; Charles D Blanke; George D Demetri; Heikki Joensuu; Peter J Roberts; Burton L Eisenberg; Margaret von Mehren; Christopher D M Fletcher; Katrin Sandau; Karen McDougall; Wen-bin Ou; Chang-Jie Chen; Jonathan A Fletcher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-09-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrea Alimonti; Arkaitz Carracedo; John G Clohessy; Lloyd C Trotman; Caterina Nardella; Ainara Egia; Leonardo Salmena; Katia Sampieri; William J Haveman; Edi Brogi; Andrea L Richardson; Jiangwen Zhang; Pier Paolo Pandolfi Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-04-18 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Anette Duensing; Fabiola Medeiros; Bryna McConarty; Nora E Joseph; Dipak Panigrahy; Samuel Singer; Christopher D M Fletcher; George D Demetri; Jonathan A Fletcher Journal: Oncogene Date: 2004-05-13 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Giuseppe Floris; Maria Debiec-Rychter; Raf Sciot; Cristiana Stefan; Steffen Fieuws; Kathleen Machiels; Peter Atadja; Agnieszka Wozniak; Gavino Faa; Patrick Schöffski Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Salvatore Romeo; Maria Debiec-Rychter; Martine Van Glabbeke; Heidi Van Paassen; Paola Comite; Ronald Van Eijk; Jan Oosting; Jaap Verweij; Philippe Terrier; Ulrike Schneider; Raf Sciot; Jean Yves Blay; Pancras C W Hogendoorn Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Harvey Hensley; Karthik Devarajan; James R Johnson; David Piwnica-Worms; Andrew K Godwin; Margaret von Mehren; Lori Rink Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Benedikt Bosbach; Ferdinand Rossi; Yasemin Yozgat; Jennifer Loo; Jennifer Q Zhang; Georgina Berrozpe; Katherine Warpinski; Imke Ehlers; Darren Veach; Andrew Kwok; Katia Manova; Cristina R Antonescu; Ronald P DeMatteo; Peter Besmer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 11.205