Literature DB >> 23231318

Strain-encoded breast MRI in phantom and ex vivo specimens with histological validation: preliminary results.

Ahmed A Haruoni1, Jakir Hossain, Riham El Khouli, Kant M Matsuda, David A Bluemke, Nael F Osman, Michael A Jacobs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of using strain-encoded (SENC) breast magnetic resonance images (MRI) for breast cancer detection by examining the compression and relaxation response properties in phantoms and ex vivo breast samples.
METHODS: A tissue phantom was constructed to mimic different sizes of breast masses and tissue stiffness. In addition, five human ex vivo whole breast specimens with and without masses were studied. MR data was acquired on a 3T scanner consisting of T(1)-weighted, fat suppressed spin echo T(2)-weighted, and SENC breast images. Mechanical tissue characteristics (strain) of the phantoms and breast tissue samples were measured using SENC imaging in both compression and relaxation modes. The breast tissue specimens were sectioned and stained in the same plane as the MRI for histological evaluation.
RESULTS: For the phantom, SENC images showed soft masses with quantitative strain values between 35% and 50%, while harder masses had strain values between 0% and 20%. Combined compression (CMP) and relaxation (REX) breast SENC images separately categorized all masses into three different groups. For breast SENC, the signal intensities between ex vivo breast mass and breast glandular tissue were significantly different (-7.6 ± 2.6 verses -20.6 ± 5.4 for SENC-CMP, and 4.2 ± 1.5 verses 22.6 ± 5 for SENC-REX, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that SENC breast MRI can be used to obtain mechanical tissue properties and give quantitative estimates of strain in tumors. This feasibility study provides the basis for future clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231318      PMCID: PMC3528768          DOI: 10.1118/1.4749963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  24 in total

1.  Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; T M Wheeler; F Kallel; B S Garra; T Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.578

2.  Detecting stiff masses using strain-encoded (SENC) imaging.

Authors:  Nael F Osman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Imaging anisotropic and viscous properties of breast tissue by magnetic resonance-elastography.

Authors:  R Sinkus; M Tanter; S Catheline; J Lorenzen; C Kuhl; E Sondermann; M Fink
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial function with MR-tagging in a multi-center study: interobserver and intraobserver agreement of fast strain analysis with Harmonic Phase (HARP) MRI.

Authors:  Ernesto Castillo; Nael F Osman; Boaz D Rosen; Iman El-Shehaby; Li Pan; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Shenghan Lai; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Elasticity reconstructive imaging by means of stimulated echo MRI.

Authors:  T L Chenevert; A R Skovoroda; M O'Donnell; S Y Emelianov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Lesion contrast enhancement in medical ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  P F Stetson; F G Sommer; A Macovski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Alexia L McKnight; Jennifer L Kugel; Phillip J Rossman; Armando Manduca; Lynn C Hartmann; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; D J Lomas; P J Rossman; J F Greenleaf; A Manduca; R L Ehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results.

Authors:  B S Garra; E I Cespedes; J Ophir; S R Spratt; R A Zuurbier; C M Magnant; M F Pennanen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy.

Authors:  David A Bluemke; Constantine A Gatsonis; Mei Hsiu Chen; Gia A DeAngelis; Nanette DeBruhl; Steven Harms; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Nola Hylton; Christiane K Kuhl; Constance Lehman; Etta D Pisano; Petrina Causer; Stuart J Schnitt; Stanley F Smazal; Carol B Stelling; Paul T Weatherall; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of liver fibrosis using fast strain-encoded MRI driven by inherent cardiac motion.

Authors:  Ahmed A Harouni; Ahmed M Gharib; Nael F Osman; Caryn Morse; Theo Heller; Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Strain-encoded magnetic resonance: a method for the assessment of myocardial deformation.

Authors:  Grigorios Korosoglou; Sorin Giusca; Nina P Hofmann; Amit R Patel; Tomas Lapinskas; Burkert Pieske; Henning Steen; Hugo A Katus; Sebastian Kelle
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-04-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.