OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla with small surface coils is a well-established procedure in the diagnosis of masses of the eye and orbital cavity. Until now histological examination has been required to obtain definitive information on tumor extent or possible infiltration of surrounding structures. With ultra-high-field MRI, however, it is possible to evaluate tumor morphology as well as possible extension into surrounding structures with submillimeter spatial resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a female patient with a uveal melanoma who underwent a preoperative MRI at 1.5 T (spatial resolution = 0.9 x 0.9 x 4 mm/voxel). Postoperatively, the enucleated specimen was examined in a 7.1 Tesla high-field MRI scanner (slice thickness = 500 µm, matrix size = 512 x 512 pixels, spatial resolution = 78 x 78 x 500 µm/voxel, acquisition time = 8:20 min per plane). Finally, the specimen was examined histologically, and the histological and MRI results were correlated. RESULTS: Ultra-high-field MRI at 7.1 Tesla visualized the uveal melanoma and anatomical structures of the bulb with high resolution, enabling definitive assessment of tumor morphology and extent. Subsequent histological examination confirmed the MRI findings regarding origin, internal structure, and extent of the tumor. CONCLUSION: MR microscopy correlates strongly with histology, suggesting that this new imaging modality has the potential for noninvasively assessing tumor morphology, extent, and infiltration of surrounding structures. The examination was performed ex vivo and demonstrates that diagnostic assessment of malignant masses is feasible using high-resolution MR microscopy.
OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla with small surface coils is a well-established procedure in the diagnosis of masses of the eye and orbital cavity. Until now histological examination has been required to obtain definitive information on tumor extent or possible infiltration of surrounding structures. With ultra-high-field MRI, however, it is possible to evaluate tumor morphology as well as possible extension into surrounding structures with submillimeter spatial resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a female patient with a uveal melanoma who underwent a preoperative MRI at 1.5 T (spatial resolution = 0.9 x 0.9 x 4 mm/voxel). Postoperatively, the enucleated specimen was examined in a 7.1 Tesla high-field MRI scanner (slice thickness = 500 µm, matrix size = 512 x 512 pixels, spatial resolution = 78 x 78 x 500 µm/voxel, acquisition time = 8:20 min per plane). Finally, the specimen was examined histologically, and the histological and MRI results were correlated. RESULTS: Ultra-high-field MRI at 7.1 Tesla visualized the uveal melanoma and anatomical structures of the bulb with high resolution, enabling definitive assessment of tumor morphology and extent. Subsequent histological examination confirmed the MRI findings regarding origin, internal structure, and extent of the tumor. CONCLUSION: MR microscopy correlates strongly with histology, suggesting that this new imaging modality has the potential for noninvasively assessing tumor morphology, extent, and infiltration of surrounding structures. The examination was performed ex vivo and demonstrates that diagnostic assessment of malignant masses is feasible using high-resolution MR microscopy.
Authors: Felix Streckenbach; Ronja Klose; Sönke Langner; Inga Langner; Marcus Frank; Andreas Wree; Anne-Marie Neumann; Änne Glass; Thomas Stahnke; Rudolf F Guthoff; Oliver Stachs; Tobias Lindner Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Stefan C A Steens; Elise M Bekers; Willem L J Weijs; Geert J S Litjens; Andor Veltien; Arie Maat; Guido B van den Broek; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Jürgen J Fütterer; Christina A Hulsbergen van der Kaa; Matthias A W Merkx; Robert P Takes Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Christian Enders; Eva-Maria Braig; Kai Scherer; Jens U Werner; Gerhard K Lang; Gabriele E Lang; Franz Pfeiffer; Peter Noël; Ernst Rummeny; Julia Herzen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.240